GTA
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
03 July 2010
Person A (Individual)paid amount of Rs. 700000/- in a P.Y. to B (transport Agency)against his Goods Transportation charges because the LR was "TO PAY", in this situation who is the liable of service tax and who can avail the service tax credit.
03 July 2010
Normally the service provider is the person liable to pay service tax. But in case of GTA the person who pays the freight, in specified set of circumstances, is responsible to pay the tax.
You have not mentioned the status of the consignor. If the consignor is one of the specified category, person A is liable to pay. In any other case, B is liable to pay.
In any case, since the the ultimate tax burden is borne by A and it being an input service, tax credit is available to A.
You have not mentioned the status of the consignor. If the consignor is one of the specified category, person A is liable to pay. In any other case, B is liable to pay.
In any case, since the the ultimate tax burden is borne by A and it being an input service, tax credit is available to A.
03 July 2010
On LR , it is mentioned by Transporter who is paid Service Tax, Transoporter/Consignee/Consignor.
If it is not mentioned and service tax also is not charged on LR. Then you have to pay service tax .
If you paid full rate of tax , then you can avail credit of service tax.
If you paid 25% of service tax as per notification of abatement, then you are not eligible for credit.
If it is not mentioned and service tax also is not charged on LR. Then you have to pay service tax .
If you paid full rate of tax , then you can avail credit of service tax.
If you paid 25% of service tax as per notification of abatement, then you are not eligible for credit.
03 July 2010
Dear Sir,
With due respect, beg to partially differ.
If the GTA service is an input service, abetment of 75% is not a bar in taking credit.
Earlier, the abetment of 75% was optional and conditional. The GTA was not to take credit of Inputs and Capital Goods as well as not to claim benefit of notification of 12/2003.
However, wef 01.03.2008, there is an unconditional exemption of 75% in terms of notification no. 13/2008-ST dated, 01.03.2008. Further, the GTA is not eligible to take any credit, as the GTA service has been omitted from the definition of Output Service.
These changes does not have any affect on the eligibility of service receiver to take Cenvat Credit.
With due respect, beg to partially differ.
If the GTA service is an input service, abetment of 75% is not a bar in taking credit.
Earlier, the abetment of 75% was optional and conditional. The GTA was not to take credit of Inputs and Capital Goods as well as not to claim benefit of notification of 12/2003.
However, wef 01.03.2008, there is an unconditional exemption of 75% in terms of notification no. 13/2008-ST dated, 01.03.2008. Further, the GTA is not eligible to take any credit, as the GTA service has been omitted from the definition of Output Service.
These changes does not have any affect on the eligibility of service receiver to take Cenvat Credit.
03 July 2010
Dear Mr. Naik,
If any person who is opting Notification 13/2008 for abatement of 75%, then no service tax credit is admissible.
Taking a credit of service tax and abatement of 75% is together is not permissible.
We have face it during excise audit when auditor disallowed service tax credit on the grount that party has paid 25% service tax as per notification 13/2008.
If you have any supporting documents by which it is proved that there is no bar to take service tax credit with abatement.
If any person who is opting Notification 13/2008 for abatement of 75%, then no service tax credit is admissible.
Taking a credit of service tax and abatement of 75% is together is not permissible.
We have face it during excise audit when auditor disallowed service tax credit on the grount that party has paid 25% service tax as per notification 13/2008.
If you have any supporting documents by which it is proved that there is no bar to take service tax credit with abatement.
03 July 2010
Sir,
We have taken credit on tax paid on GTA service availed by us and my record stood audited.
GTA is not eligible to take credit, as GTA is no more an output service.
There is nothing in Cenvat Credit Rules or in the notification 13/2008 to deny Cenvat to the receiver of GTA Service, provided it is an input service.
Once the condition of input service and payment thereof is satisfied, Cenvat is available, unless specifically disallowed.
In my view, the action on the part of the auditor was not proper.
We have taken credit on tax paid on GTA service availed by us and my record stood audited.
GTA is not eligible to take credit, as GTA is no more an output service.
There is nothing in Cenvat Credit Rules or in the notification 13/2008 to deny Cenvat to the receiver of GTA Service, provided it is an input service.
Once the condition of input service and payment thereof is satisfied, Cenvat is available, unless specifically disallowed.
In my view, the action on the part of the auditor was not proper.
Message likes :
1 times
03 July 2010
I m also talking about Service Receiptent, not for GTA himself.
Now I also discussed about it with our Account person who is handling excise.
He told that he is not taking credit on it due to above case.
But he disucssed about it at last audit, they told that there is nothing for denying it as well as taking credit.
Thanks for your valuable feedback.
Now I will check it our consultant level for his opinion.
Now I also discussed about it with our Account person who is handling excise.
He told that he is not taking credit on it due to above case.
But he disucssed about it at last audit, they told that there is nothing for denying it as well as taking credit.
Thanks for your valuable feedback.
Now I will check it our consultant level for his opinion.
06 July 2010
Dear Mr. Bansal,
Similar query has been answered in the Service Tax Review Journal at 2010(18)S.T.R. J156, which may also be referred.
Similar query has been answered in the Service Tax Review Journal at 2010(18)S.T.R. J156, which may also be referred.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Section 54F - Exemption on LTCG in 2026 for HP purchased in 2023
- STCG....................................................
- TAN for Partnership
- Sales return eway bill
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- AMOUNT RECEIVED UNDER COMPULOSRY ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
- Taxation on LTCG for property sold after 24JUL2024
- GST ON DAMAGED GOODS
- GST Registration Horse racing
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
