Fringe benefit

This query is : Resolved

CA JAIMIN TRIVEDI (Querist)
Follow

14 March 2009 My client in mumbai, is having a branch in delhi who has hired some employees in delhi. the sales representative in dekhi works for the company in a hired car. the branch gives to the employee a fixed rate of 5 rupees per km. then the head office reimburses the branch for the amount spent.

in which head should the exp be accounted for fringe benefit, Conveyance or Travelling?

CA Tilak Raj Sharma

CA Tilak Raj Sharma (Expert)
Follow

14 March 2009 U/s 115WB(2)(F) - Conveyance, Tour and Travel.

CA.Tarun Maheshwari

CA.Tarun Maheshwari (Expert)
Follow

14 March 2009 this case shall be covered in 'Conveyance'.
Tour and travelling is a separate head now under fringe benefit laws.

CA JAIMIN TRIVEDI

CA JAIMIN TRIVEDI (Querist)
Follow

16 March 2009 i am aware that there are two seperate heads now. i.e conveyance and Tour and travelling. but my query is why will it go to conveyance and not travelling?

CA.Tarun Maheshwari

CA.Tarun Maheshwari (Expert)
Follow

16 March 2009 Generally, the expenses incurred for travelling within the city are treated as Conveyance. In your case also, it is reimbursement for local travelling. In Tour and Travelling expenses we generally take Travelling out of city.

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok