Form ITR-6.
This query is : Resolved
Guest
Guest
(Querist)
18 September 2010
ABC Private Limited is having registered office in New Delhi.
One of the company's directors or DSC signatory is in Chennai, who is e-filing the form.
Please clarify the basic query, which I have :
Whether in Form ITR-6, should the company mention the location as 'NEW DELHI' or 'CHENNAI'.
As the form is e-filed using DSC, is it appropriate to mention the location as 'NEW DELHI' only, as the registered office of the company is at New Delhi, even though the form is e-filed by the DSC signatory in Chennai.
Thank you and I shall wait for the response.
One of the company's directors or DSC signatory is in Chennai, who is e-filing the form.
Please clarify the basic query, which I have :
Whether in Form ITR-6, should the company mention the location as 'NEW DELHI' or 'CHENNAI'.
As the form is e-filed using DSC, is it appropriate to mention the location as 'NEW DELHI' only, as the registered office of the company is at New Delhi, even though the form is e-filed by the DSC signatory in Chennai.
Thank you and I shall wait for the response.
CA Sanat Pyne
(Expert)
18 September 2010
YOU HAVE TO MENTION THE LOCATION OF REGISTERED OFFICE OF THE COMPANY.
18 September 2010
Sir
May I presume that the "location" mentioned by you is "place" mentioned in the verification part of ITR 6. If it is so, since the return is verified at Chennai by the DSC holder, the location ,as per my understanding ,may be shown as Chennai. There are two reasons for this.
1) If he department wants, they can trace the computer system from where the return of income has been uploaded.
2) False verification may lead to prosecution of the signatory under section 277 of the Income tax Act,1961.
N.B :- The second point, as you very well know, is also given in instruction no. 16 of the ITR-6.
May I presume that the "location" mentioned by you is "place" mentioned in the verification part of ITR 6. If it is so, since the return is verified at Chennai by the DSC holder, the location ,as per my understanding ,may be shown as Chennai. There are two reasons for this.
1) If he department wants, they can trace the computer system from where the return of income has been uploaded.
2) False verification may lead to prosecution of the signatory under section 277 of the Income tax Act,1961.
N.B :- The second point, as you very well know, is also given in instruction no. 16 of the ITR-6.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
- " Income from House Property " in joint names of co-owners
- REGARDING TDS RETURN OF FORM 27Q
- Notice under e-Verification Scheme
- GST demand notice for ITC reversal against exempted supply.
- RCM ON SECURITY CHARGES FROM INDIVIDUALS
- How to get money back from delisted company
- ITC not to be taken in accounts & GSTR-3B
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
