excise


This query is : Resolved 

(Querist)
10 January 2011 from where can i get the whole judgement of this case law with facts etc...





Jaya Singh Vijaya Jhaveri 2010
Is the want of evidence from foreign supplier enough to cancel the confiscation order of goods undervalued?-----can’t cancel the confiscation order or[court upheld [supported] confiscation order]

The Court considered it be illogical that a person [supplier]who was a party to undervaluation would give evidence to the Department to prove the case that the invoice raised by him [supplier] on the respondent was a bogus one and that he[supplier] had received underhand payment of the differential price


for eg----the importer had paid royalty to Mr C & this amt is not included in foreign supplier's bill it means undervaluation.in the above case law differential price means this royalty amt







10 February 2011 LINK IS:-

https://lawcrux.org/data4T/cl/clhigh/74594.htm


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
24 October 2026
CA Industrial Trainee

Fytomax Nutrition Private Limited

Aurangabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
GST & TDS ASSISTANT

AGGARWAL SANJAY & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 October 2026
Accounts Executive

Synergy Keystone

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
02 November 2026
Audit Executive

SRJP & Co LLP

Kochi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
10 October 2026
Accounts Associate Level 1

Abic and Mani Chartered Accountants

Kottayam

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 October 2026
Articled Trainee

J Y & CO

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
15 October 2026
Senior Accountant

Continental Belting Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 October 2026
CA ARTICLE

AMKN & CO

Noida

CA Inter

View Details