excise

This query is : Resolved 

10 January 2011 from where can i get the whole judgement of this case law with facts etc...





Jaya Singh Vijaya Jhaveri 2010
Is the want of evidence from foreign supplier enough to cancel the confiscation order of goods undervalued?-----can’t cancel the confiscation order or[court upheld [supported] confiscation order]

The Court considered it be illogical that a person [supplier]who was a party to undervaluation would give evidence to the Department to prove the case that the invoice raised by him [supplier] on the respondent was a bogus one and that he[supplier] had received underhand payment of the differential price


for eg----the importer had paid royalty to Mr C & this amt is not included in foreign supplier's bill it means undervaluation.in the above case law differential price means this royalty amt







10 February 2011 LINK IS:-

https://lawcrux.org/data4T/cl/clhigh/74594.htm


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

ANV & Company

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
05 July 2026
Financial Controller

NovumLake Partners

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
CA Articled Trainee And Paid Assistant

SKAA & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 July 2026
Articleship

Jawahar and Associates Chartered Accountants

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details