Cst sales u/s 6(2)

This query is : Resolved

Querist : Anonymous

Querist : Anonymous (Querist)

11 February 2012 CAN A DEALER SALES GOODS BY TRANSFER OF DOCUMENTS IN THE SAME STATE FROM WHERE GOODS PURCHASED WITHOUT CROSSING STATE BARRIER U/S 6(2) OF CST ACT?? WHETHER EX-FACTORY DELIVERY SALES AGAINST C FORM IS VALID I.S.S OR NOT???

CA CS Pawan Jajoo

CA CS Pawan Jajoo (Expert)
Follow

13 February 2012 Yes you can sell by transfer of document of title within state.

Querist : Anonymous

Querist : Anonymous (Querist)

15 February 2012 ANY SC OR HC JUDGEMENT FOR THAT SALES?

CA CS Pawan Jajoo

CA CS Pawan Jajoo (Expert)
Follow

15 February 2012 You can purchase from same state and sale it in transit to other state for 6(2) deduction.

But you cant purchase and sale in same state . In transit sale goods should move from one state

M/s. Fatechand Chaturbhujdas vs. State of Maharashtra (S.A.894 of 1990 dated.12-8-1991) decided by Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal
In this case the local party purchased goods from other local party and directed the same to be despatched to outside State party. Even though local party was shown as consignor, taking the view that while placing order there is term for outside place dispatches, Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal held that the sale between two local parties is first interstate sale and the sale by local party to outside party is subsequent interstate sale, duly exempt u/s. 6(2).
In short even if there is predetermined sale, there is no adverse effect on the sale to be claimed u/s. 6(2). On the other hand, in light of above judgments, the claim gets more authentic. The transfer of property to ultimate purchaser (consignee) gets synchronized at the time of booking the goods with the carrier and hence the subsequent sales take place by transfer of documents of title to goods as held by High Court in above case of 84 STC 317. The claim of exemption is to be allowed under above circumstances subject to production of required forms.

3. M/s. Duvent Fans P. Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu (113 STC 431)(Mad.)
Local dealer purchased goods from other local dealer and directed to send them to his purchaser’s place in other State. Madras High Court held that the first transaction is first interstate sale and the second sale is also subsequent interstate sale exempt u/s.6(2) of CST Act. The above judgment is directly on issue and hence will govern the field.
In fact there are many judgments on this issue. However since the legal position about transfer of documents as well as predetermined sale is clear from above judgments, no further citations are given here for sake of brevity.
Thus the “sale in transit” can be effected by any of above modes

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok