TREATEMENT OF LOAN GIVEN TO M.D'S WIFE.can you answer this?
This query is : Resolved
29 August 2009
Mr X is MD of of ABCD&SONS PVT LTD.
COMPANY HAD ACCUMULATED PROFITS OF RS.750000 AS ON 31.03.2008.
IT GRANTS LOAN OF RS.450000 TO HIS(MR. x, MD) WIFE ON 01.06.2008 FOR PURCHASES OF HOUSE, WHICH WAS REPAID ON 31.12.2008
THE COMPANY CHARGED NO INTEREST ON THE SAID LOAN.
EXAMINE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THESE TRANSACTIONS.
MAKE YOUR OWN ASSUMPTIONS...
(in contest of income from house property.)
MAIL ID :bujji.manu@yahoo.co.in
COMPANY HAD ACCUMULATED PROFITS OF RS.750000 AS ON 31.03.2008.
IT GRANTS LOAN OF RS.450000 TO HIS(MR. x, MD) WIFE ON 01.06.2008 FOR PURCHASES OF HOUSE, WHICH WAS REPAID ON 31.12.2008
THE COMPANY CHARGED NO INTEREST ON THE SAID LOAN.
EXAMINE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THESE TRANSACTIONS.
MAKE YOUR OWN ASSUMPTIONS...
(in contest of income from house property.)
MAIL ID :bujji.manu@yahoo.co.in
29 August 2009
Treated as a deemed dividend in the hands of assessee (i.e. Director).
29 August 2009
BUT THE LOAN WAS paid to MD wife
29 August 2009
Yes it is deemed dividend even though the advance ceased to be outstanding at the end of the previous year.
Citation:- 1) Smt. Tarulata Shyam Vs. CIT (1977) 108 ITR 345 (SC).
2) Miss. P. Sarada Vs. CIT (1998) 96 Taxman 11 (SC).
Citation:- 1) Smt. Tarulata Shyam Vs. CIT (1977) 108 ITR 345 (SC).
2) Miss. P. Sarada Vs. CIT (1998) 96 Taxman 11 (SC).
29 August 2009
does MD's wife covered under sec2(22)e ????
30 August 2009
Fact of repayment of loan is not relevant - The Legislature has deliberately not made the subsistence of the loan or advance, or its being outstanding on the last date of the previous year relevant to the assessment year, a prerequisite for raising the statutory fiction. In other words, even if the loan or advance ceased to be outstanding at the end of the previous year, it can still be deemed as a ‘dividend’ if the other four conditions factually exist to the extent of the accumulated profits possessed by the company. - Smt. Tarulata Shyam v. CIT [1977] 108 ITR 345 (SC) [See also Miss P. Sarada v. CIT [1998] 96 Taxman 11 (SC)].
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Current Account Opening for Sole Proprietorship with Udyam Certificate - Zero Turnover
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- TDS on Purchase of Immovable Property by NRI from NRI
- Capital gain from sale of house property
- Copyright software
- Value of property in capital gain
- When TDS on GST applied
- Annual return in Gst
- FORM 26A APPLICABILITY
- Before GSTAT- APL-02 Vs APL-04
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
