The difference between reportable &non-reportable judgments

This query is : Resolved

Querist : Anonymous

Querist : Anonymous (Querist)

18 December 2013 Dear Experts,

Often, in the judgments delivered by High COurts and Supreme Court, some are categorized as "reportable" whereas some are categorized as "non-reportable".

Can any one explain the difference between there two.

1.What will be implication of a "non-reportable" judgment?

2. Whether such judgments has got any precedence value?

3. What is the authority under which the judgments are categorized?

Aashok Kumar Sharma online

Aashok Kumar Sharma online

(Expert)
Follow

02 August 2025 Great question! Here’s a clear explanation about **reportable** and **non-reportable** judgments:

---

### 1. What is the difference between Reportable and Non-Reportable Judgments?

* **Reportable Judgments:**

* These are judgments that the court **authorizes to be published** in official law reports or law journals.
* Usually, such judgments contain important legal principles, interpretations, or clarifications.
* They are intended to serve as **precedents** and guide future cases.

* **Non-Reportable Judgments:**

* These are judgments that **the court does not permit to be published** officially.
* Typically, they may deal with routine, procedural, or fact-specific issues without laying down broad legal principles.
* They are **not included** in official law reports.

---

### 2. Implication of a Non-Reportable Judgment

* Such judgments **do not appear in official law reports**, so they are not widely accessible.
* They are usually considered **not binding precedent** because they may lack general legal principles or are too case-specific.
* However, they **may still be persuasive** or referred to in court, depending on the context and the reasoning.

---

### 3. Precedence Value of Non-Reportable Judgments

* Generally, **non-reportable judgments have little or no binding precedent value**.
* They are not regarded as authoritative or significant for establishing legal principles.
* However, lawyers or judges may still refer to them in some cases as persuasive if they find the reasoning helpful.

---

### 4. Authority for Categorizing Judgments

* The **court itself decides** whether a judgment is reportable or non-reportable.
* The decision is usually based on factors like:

* Whether the judgment deals with **substantial questions of law**.
* The **importance** or **novelty** of the legal issues decided.
* Whether the judgment is **routine** or **fact-specific**.
* Sometimes, the **Registrar or Law Reporting Committee** of the court also plays a role in selecting reportable judgments.

---

### Summary

| Aspect | Reportable Judgment | Non-Reportable Judgment |
| ---------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ |
| Publication | Officially published in law reports | Not published officially |
| Legal importance | Contains important legal principles | Usually routine or fact-specific decisions |
| Precedent value | Binding precedent | Usually no binding value |
| Accessibility | Widely accessible | Limited accessibility |
| Decided by | Court and Law Reporting Committee | Court's discretion |

---

If you want, I can also share some examples or cases illustrating this distinction! Would you like that?

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now