St 3 error
This query is : Resolved
11 May 2016
below issues are appearing in ST-3, how can the resolve the same.
V2SRC12 The Challan Number { 01707991005201600031 } for {Rs.5565/-} in H1 section does not exist and/or is not matching
with the Registration Number available in the database.
2. V2SRC24 The Opening Balance of CENVAT Credit of Service Tax {Rs.0/-}, EDU Cess {Rs.0/-} and SHE Cess {Rs.0/-} entered in
the current return could not be verified with the Closing Balance of the return for {Apr-Sep, 2015-2016}, as the Return
for { Apr-Sep, 2015-2016 } is not available in the database. The return should be filed immediately.
3. V2SRC27 Sum of SB Cess Paid {Rs.684/-} is less than sum of SB Cess Payable {Rs.840/-}. Differential amount is {Rs.-156/-}.
V2SRC12 The Challan Number { 01707991005201600031 } for {Rs.5565/-} in H1 section does not exist and/or is not matching
with the Registration Number available in the database.
2. V2SRC24 The Opening Balance of CENVAT Credit of Service Tax {Rs.0/-}, EDU Cess {Rs.0/-} and SHE Cess {Rs.0/-} entered in
the current return could not be verified with the Closing Balance of the return for {Apr-Sep, 2015-2016}, as the Return
for { Apr-Sep, 2015-2016 } is not available in the database. The return should be filed immediately.
3. V2SRC27 Sum of SB Cess Paid {Rs.684/-} is less than sum of SB Cess Payable {Rs.840/-}. Differential amount is {Rs.-156/-}.
12 May 2016
The errors are clarified below:
(1) This error is shown in two cases - either when the Challan No. and / or amount is mismatched or else the payment has been made recently. It takes 4 / 5 working days for the paid challan to be displayed on the ACES site - hence the error. If it is only due to time difference, nothing need done. After a week or so the error will disappear. If it is due to mismatch of challan no. / amount, the ST - 3 has to be revised.
(2) It appears that the return for the earlier half year has not been filed, either because it was a 'NIL return or due to oversight. If it is the latter, the ST-3 should be filed with late filing fee. Else nothing need be done.
(3) Please check up all calculations and enteries in the taxable service sheets. The total of SBC in these sheets totals Rs. 840/- whereas the challan payment is Rs. 684/-. Check the calculations once again. Maybe by oversight, the November 2015 service has been entered in the 14.5% column whereas, the services rendered after 15th November 2015 only is subject to SBC. Check up the entries and if it is a short payment pay the difference and intimate the Range Superintendent in writing with the GAR-7 challan. If it is a presentation or entry error, then the ST - 3 would have to be revised.
(1) This error is shown in two cases - either when the Challan No. and / or amount is mismatched or else the payment has been made recently. It takes 4 / 5 working days for the paid challan to be displayed on the ACES site - hence the error. If it is only due to time difference, nothing need done. After a week or so the error will disappear. If it is due to mismatch of challan no. / amount, the ST - 3 has to be revised.
(2) It appears that the return for the earlier half year has not been filed, either because it was a 'NIL return or due to oversight. If it is the latter, the ST-3 should be filed with late filing fee. Else nothing need be done.
(3) Please check up all calculations and enteries in the taxable service sheets. The total of SBC in these sheets totals Rs. 840/- whereas the challan payment is Rs. 684/-. Check the calculations once again. Maybe by oversight, the November 2015 service has been entered in the 14.5% column whereas, the services rendered after 15th November 2015 only is subject to SBC. Check up the entries and if it is a short payment pay the difference and intimate the Range Superintendent in writing with the GAR-7 challan. If it is a presentation or entry error, then the ST - 3 would have to be revised.
12 May 2016
RS 156 deposited in Service tax code in the month of Jan-16, Not deposited in SBC code....
i think no need to pay now,,,,,,,thanks a lot for your expert opinion...
i think no need to pay now,,,,,,,thanks a lot for your expert opinion...
12 May 2016
An explanatory letter should then be filed with the Range Superintend, clarifying this point else notice for recovery of the said sum would be issued in normal course - an avoidable harassment.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- About TDS & Income Tax
- Section 194JA & JB Income which ITR Form to use
- Pass word to open justification report for Q1 for FY 2026-27
- PPF interest-As Exempt Income disclosure
- Under construction property in ITR
- Scrutiny and reopening of past returns
- Booth for sales promotion
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- Building tax payment deduction in rental Income
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Difference in GSTR3B system generated which is correct and actual Payment it asks
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
- 44ad eligble money lending interest
- Taxation in the hands of Landowner under JDA
- Delisted shares sold in off market/ Rebate u/s87A
- In Exports Sales HSN details where to fill
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
