Section 314
This query is : Resolved
08 December 2010
Hi...
There is a Company say ABC Ltd. having 3 Directors Mr.A,Mr.B and Mr.C. Mr. B is brother of Mr. A and is appointed as MD of Director of the Company. Now, as per the provisions of section 314 of the Companies Act, 1956 a relative of Director can hold the office of MD or Manager carrying a monthly remuneration of Rs.15,000/-. Now, since Mr. B is holding the office of MD carrying the monthly remuneration of over and above Rs.10,000, no approval of the members by way of a Special Resolution will be required.
Suppose, Mr. B ceased to be a MD of the Company w.e.f.27.04.2010 and continues to be a Director of the Company with the same remuneration, then whether it can be said that Mr.B is holding the office or place of profit from the date he ceased to be MD of the Company. Whether the consent of the members by way of a special resolution should have been obtained at the GM of the Company held immediately after he ceased to be MD but continued as Director of the Company??????
Please held??????
There is a Company say ABC Ltd. having 3 Directors Mr.A,Mr.B and Mr.C. Mr. B is brother of Mr. A and is appointed as MD of Director of the Company. Now, as per the provisions of section 314 of the Companies Act, 1956 a relative of Director can hold the office of MD or Manager carrying a monthly remuneration of Rs.15,000/-. Now, since Mr. B is holding the office of MD carrying the monthly remuneration of over and above Rs.10,000, no approval of the members by way of a Special Resolution will be required.
Suppose, Mr. B ceased to be a MD of the Company w.e.f.27.04.2010 and continues to be a Director of the Company with the same remuneration, then whether it can be said that Mr.B is holding the office or place of profit from the date he ceased to be MD of the Company. Whether the consent of the members by way of a special resolution should have been obtained at the GM of the Company held immediately after he ceased to be MD but continued as Director of the Company??????
Please held??????
09 December 2010
If he continues to be WTD of the Company and does not draw any remuneration other than stated above, he will not be said to hold office of office or place of profit.
09 December 2010
Hi...
But the case represents the relative of Director holding the office as a Director in the Company and can be said to hold the office or place of profit if he is drawing remuneration in excess of Rs.10,000
But the case represents the relative of Director holding the office as a Director in the Company and can be said to hold the office or place of profit if he is drawing remuneration in excess of Rs.10,000
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- Type of Capital Gain
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Regarding ITR filing with more value than showing in AIS/TIS
- ASMT-10 received from A O
- ITR-3 File/Error Found
- Difff in ais receipts and gst turnover
- ITR-Capital Gain
- Rental income of jointly held property
- Loss of interest in PF transfer from EPFO to Trust
- Seeking Advice: High Tax Shortfall on Job Switch + Let-Out House Property Loss in FY 2025-26
- TDS offline utility
- TDS on rent received on hardship compensation being rent on redevelopment of building
- Housing Society-ITR5
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- PF Taxable Income
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
