Section 295 of companies act, 1956
This query is : Open
18 September 2012
If wholly owned subsidiary company gives loan to its Holding company, then will this transaction attract the provisions of section 295 of Companies Act, 1956 or not.? and also give the violations of this section
Both companies are Public Limited Companies
Expert Please Give your Comments
Both companies are Public Limited Companies
Expert Please Give your Comments
18 September 2012
As far as my knowledge is concerned, exemption is given only when HOLDING gives loan to subsidiary.. if subsidiary company is giving loan to holding, it does attract section 295.. still let other experts answer..
Message likes :
1 times
18 September 2012
Thank you sir for your kind view.
I want to ask it is also applicable in the case of the "Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" ?
and also Other view, if any
I want to ask it is also applicable in the case of the "Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" ?
and also Other view, if any
18 September 2012
According Sub-section (2), following transactions are exempted from the restrictions of sub-section (1)
i) Any loan made, guarantee given or security provided – by a private company which is not a subsidiary of a public company,
ii) Any loan made – by a holding company to its subsidiary,
iii) Any guarantee given or security provided – by a holding company in respect of a loan made to its subsidiary.
So Reverse Case is Missing in This Section.
It Means Loan From Subsidiary to Holding is Not Exempted u/s 295.
It Will Attract Penalty.
i) Any loan made, guarantee given or security provided – by a private company which is not a subsidiary of a public company,
ii) Any loan made – by a holding company to its subsidiary,
iii) Any guarantee given or security provided – by a holding company in respect of a loan made to its subsidiary.
So Reverse Case is Missing in This Section.
It Means Loan From Subsidiary to Holding is Not Exempted u/s 295.
It Will Attract Penalty.
Message likes :
1 times
18 September 2012
Yes ashutosh, even "wholly" owned subsidiary is not liable for exemption..
Message likes :
1 times
19 September 2012
Thank You Sir....
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- ITR filing- non tax audit cases- Asstt.Year 2026-2027
- Soyabean hsn code and gst rate
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- ITR returnFY25-26
- BIS Certificates
- Itr 1 processing
- TDS on payment to CHA as per new section
- Sale of Forign Shares
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Small dealers gst returns filing
- Sales amount in Gstr1
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
