Section 295 of companies act, 1956
This query is : Open
18 September 2012
If wholly owned subsidiary company gives loan to its Holding company, then will this transaction attract the provisions of section 295 of Companies Act, 1956 or not.? and also give the violations of this section
Both companies are Public Limited Companies
Expert Please Give your Comments
Both companies are Public Limited Companies
Expert Please Give your Comments
18 September 2012
As far as my knowledge is concerned, exemption is given only when HOLDING gives loan to subsidiary.. if subsidiary company is giving loan to holding, it does attract section 295.. still let other experts answer..
Message likes :
1 times
18 September 2012
Thank you sir for your kind view.
I want to ask it is also applicable in the case of the "Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" ?
and also Other view, if any
I want to ask it is also applicable in the case of the "Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" ?
and also Other view, if any
18 September 2012
According Sub-section (2), following transactions are exempted from the restrictions of sub-section (1)
i) Any loan made, guarantee given or security provided – by a private company which is not a subsidiary of a public company,
ii) Any loan made – by a holding company to its subsidiary,
iii) Any guarantee given or security provided – by a holding company in respect of a loan made to its subsidiary.
So Reverse Case is Missing in This Section.
It Means Loan From Subsidiary to Holding is Not Exempted u/s 295.
It Will Attract Penalty.
i) Any loan made, guarantee given or security provided – by a private company which is not a subsidiary of a public company,
ii) Any loan made – by a holding company to its subsidiary,
iii) Any guarantee given or security provided – by a holding company in respect of a loan made to its subsidiary.
So Reverse Case is Missing in This Section.
It Means Loan From Subsidiary to Holding is Not Exempted u/s 295.
It Will Attract Penalty.
Message likes :
1 times
18 September 2012
Yes ashutosh, even "wholly" owned subsidiary is not liable for exemption..
Message likes :
1 times
19 September 2012
Thank You Sir....
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- CLOSING STOCK QUERY
- CASH GIFT FROM BLOOD RELATIVE
- TDS offline utility
- Due Date Clarity
- Gst on travel by air for business purposes
- Query regarding TDS on EPFO Higher Pension Arrears- under wrong section
- Query regarding Item 61/62/63 vs Item 64 in ITR-3
- Rent claimed on building given on permissive possession basis
- Taxability of credit in canara bank ET & T section (NRO)
- DUE DATE FOR ITR FILING
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
- Query regarding reporting of exempt foreign remuneration in ITR (AY 2026-27)
- FEMA/RBI treatment — Amazon.ca arbitrage (US buy, Canada sell, goods never enter India)
- Goods return by customer
- INWARD REMITTANCE FOREIGN
- CPC and SAC
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
