Section 295
This query is : Resolved
30 November 2010
Hi...
A company ABC Ltd. has 3 Directors A,B,and C. Now, Mr.D is a relative of Mr. A.If we propose to give a loan to Mr.D then the provisions of section 295 have to be complied with.
XYZ Ltd. is a holding company of ABC Ltd. Mr. R is a relative of Mr. X who is a Director in XYZ Ltd. If Mr. R apporaches the Company ABC Ltd. for a loan of Rs.50 Crores, then whether provisions of section 295 ofthe Act are applicable?
To summarise, whether the provisions of section 295 get attracted and will have to be complied with in case the Company proposes to give a loan to a person who is a relative of a Director of its Holding Company??????? Pl. clarify its urgent???????
A company ABC Ltd. has 3 Directors A,B,and C. Now, Mr.D is a relative of Mr. A.If we propose to give a loan to Mr.D then the provisions of section 295 have to be complied with.
XYZ Ltd. is a holding company of ABC Ltd. Mr. R is a relative of Mr. X who is a Director in XYZ Ltd. If Mr. R apporaches the Company ABC Ltd. for a loan of Rs.50 Crores, then whether provisions of section 295 ofthe Act are applicable?
To summarise, whether the provisions of section 295 get attracted and will have to be complied with in case the Company proposes to give a loan to a person who is a relative of a Director of its Holding Company??????? Pl. clarify its urgent???????
30 November 2010
Hi,
It is not possible to give loan to Mr. R without CG's approval bcoz section 295 is applicable in the given case. As per my interpretation of section 295(1)(a) this clause includes the following persons:
1. Director of Lending company
2. Director of Lending company's Holding company
Both the above 2 comes under the word "such" being used in clause (a) of section 295(1).
3. Any partner or ralative of such director.
So your case is falling under point 3 above. Mr. R is relative of such director covered under point 2 above.
Thank you
It is not possible to give loan to Mr. R without CG's approval bcoz section 295 is applicable in the given case. As per my interpretation of section 295(1)(a) this clause includes the following persons:
1. Director of Lending company
2. Director of Lending company's Holding company
Both the above 2 comes under the word "such" being used in clause (a) of section 295(1).
3. Any partner or ralative of such director.
So your case is falling under point 3 above. Mr. R is relative of such director covered under point 2 above.
Thank you
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- Soyabean hsn code and gst rate
- ITR filing- non tax audit cases- Asstt.Year 2026-2027
- Last year TDS Claim
- GSTR-4 Annual Return ! Pending Returns for F.Y. 20-21 to 22-23
- Long Term Service award taxability in hands of company
- Regarding IMS Mandatory from 1st July 2026
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- Capital Gain on EUITY Shares
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Small dealers gst returns filing
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
