Section 295
This query is : Resolved
30 November 2010
Hi...
A company ABC Ltd. has 3 Directors A,B,and C. Now, Mr.D is a relative of Mr. A.If we propose to give a loan to Mr.D then the provisions of section 295 have to be complied with.
XYZ Ltd. is a holding company of ABC Ltd. Mr. R is a relative of Mr. X who is a Director in XYZ Ltd. If Mr. R apporaches the Company ABC Ltd. for a loan of Rs.50 Crores, then whether provisions of section 295 ofthe Act are applicable?
To summarise, whether the provisions of section 295 get attracted and will have to be complied with in case the Company proposes to give a loan to a person who is a relative of a Director of its Holding Company??????? Pl. clarify its urgent???????
A company ABC Ltd. has 3 Directors A,B,and C. Now, Mr.D is a relative of Mr. A.If we propose to give a loan to Mr.D then the provisions of section 295 have to be complied with.
XYZ Ltd. is a holding company of ABC Ltd. Mr. R is a relative of Mr. X who is a Director in XYZ Ltd. If Mr. R apporaches the Company ABC Ltd. for a loan of Rs.50 Crores, then whether provisions of section 295 ofthe Act are applicable?
To summarise, whether the provisions of section 295 get attracted and will have to be complied with in case the Company proposes to give a loan to a person who is a relative of a Director of its Holding Company??????? Pl. clarify its urgent???????
30 November 2010
Hi,
It is not possible to give loan to Mr. R without CG's approval bcoz section 295 is applicable in the given case. As per my interpretation of section 295(1)(a) this clause includes the following persons:
1. Director of Lending company
2. Director of Lending company's Holding company
Both the above 2 comes under the word "such" being used in clause (a) of section 295(1).
3. Any partner or ralative of such director.
So your case is falling under point 3 above. Mr. R is relative of such director covered under point 2 above.
Thank you
It is not possible to give loan to Mr. R without CG's approval bcoz section 295 is applicable in the given case. As per my interpretation of section 295(1)(a) this clause includes the following persons:
1. Director of Lending company
2. Director of Lending company's Holding company
Both the above 2 comes under the word "such" being used in clause (a) of section 295(1).
3. Any partner or ralative of such director.
So your case is falling under point 3 above. Mr. R is relative of such director covered under point 2 above.
Thank you
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Type of Capital Gain
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- Taxability of credit in canara bank ET & T section (NRO)
- Accounting with Claude
- NRI INSURANCE ADVISOR
- LIABILITY ADJUSTMENT
- VALUATION OF PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY SHARES
- Difference in GSTR3B system generated which is correct and actual Payment it asks
- Applicability of Books of Account for Commission Income (Sections 194D & 194H)
- Gst on travel by air for business purposes
- Loss of interest in PF transfer from EPFO to Trust
- Seeking Advice: High Tax Shortfall on Job Switch + Let-Out House Property Loss in FY 2025-26
- TDS offline utility
- TDS on rent received on hardship compensation being rent on redevelopment of building
- Housing Society-ITR5
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
