Revision of service tax return
This query is : Resolved
01 March 2012
A CONCERN HAS FILED SERVICE TAX RETURN OF APRIL TO SEP 2010 , BUT THE SERVICE TAX AS CALCULATED BY THE CONCERN IS NOT PROPER , THE PAYABLE AMOUNT IS NOW CALCULATED AND IT IS ABOVE WHAT HAS BEEN DEPOSITED AND FILED IN THE RETURN.
I WANT TO KNOW THAT I CAME TO KNOW THIS FACT NOW ON 01.03.2012, AND AFTER APR - SEP-2010 NO RETURN HAS BEEN FILED NOR ANY SERVICE TAX AMOUNT HAS BEEN PAID?
WHATS THE REMEDY AND APPLICABLE PENALTY?
I WANT TO KNOW THAT I CAME TO KNOW THIS FACT NOW ON 01.03.2012, AND AFTER APR - SEP-2010 NO RETURN HAS BEEN FILED NOR ANY SERVICE TAX AMOUNT HAS BEEN PAID?
WHATS THE REMEDY AND APPLICABLE PENALTY?
04 March 2012
Dear Mr. Rathor,
The concern can follow any one course of action out of below two options available:
(I) Belated Filing of return:
1. It attracts LATE FEES of Rs.20,000/-(in your case) in terms of Rule 7-C of ST Rules, 1994.
2. However, in case of NIL Return only, waive/reduction of Late fees can be requested for by an application to CEO with satisfying reasons for not filinf the return.
3. Your belated return will be scrutinized in normal course.
(II) Non - Filing of Return
1. It attracts PENALTY (max. limit upto Rs.10,000/-) in terms of Sec 77 of FA, 1994.
2. Waiver of penalty can be requested for (sec 80 of FA, 1994).
3. It is most likely to lead to "Best Judgement Assesssment" (Sec 72 of FA, 1994)
In my opinion; Option (I) is recommended.
The concern can follow any one course of action out of below two options available:
(I) Belated Filing of return:
1. It attracts LATE FEES of Rs.20,000/-(in your case) in terms of Rule 7-C of ST Rules, 1994.
2. However, in case of NIL Return only, waive/reduction of Late fees can be requested for by an application to CEO with satisfying reasons for not filinf the return.
3. Your belated return will be scrutinized in normal course.
(II) Non - Filing of Return
1. It attracts PENALTY (max. limit upto Rs.10,000/-) in terms of Sec 77 of FA, 1994.
2. Waiver of penalty can be requested for (sec 80 of FA, 1994).
3. It is most likely to lead to "Best Judgement Assesssment" (Sec 72 of FA, 1994)
In my opinion; Option (I) is recommended.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- STCG....................................................
- Section 54F - Exemption on LTCG in 2026 for HP purchased in 2023
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- TAN for Partnership
- Sales return eway bill
- AMOUNT RECEIVED UNDER COMPULOSRY ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
- Long Term Service award taxability in hands of company
- Is E Way Bill Valid If Transport ID Not Mentioned in PART A But Vehicle details mentioned in PART B
- Specified Profession
- Is it compulsory to File 10E if Income including Pension Arrears is below 12 Lakh for the F Y 25 26
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
