Related party transactions under revised clause 49
This query is : Resolved
13 August 2014
I have following queries on compliance related to related party transactions (RPT) under revised Clause 49 w.e.f. Oct 1, 2014:
Query 1: From the definition of RPT under revised Cl 49–‘a transfer of resources, services or obligations between a company and a related party, regardless of whether a price is charged’, does the expression ‘transfer of resources or obligation’ also cover loans, investments, provision of security or guarantee by a listed entity to its related parties?
Query 2: Material RPT defined as ‘a transaction with a related party shall be considered material if the transaction / transactions to be entered into individually or taken together with previous transactions during a financial year, exceeds five percent of the annual turnover or twenty percent of the net worth of the company as per the last audited financial statements of the company, whichever is higher’
In case, there are transactions with related party of varied nature such as purchase transactions, sale transactions, transactions related to leasing of properties, while identifying material RPTs, do we have to club all kinds of RPTs as under expression used ’taken together’ (i.e. Clubbing sales, purchase, lease transactions together and check if the aggregate value exceeds given threshold limits OR to club RPTs same only similar nature (i.e. Clubbing of only all the purchase transactions and check if the aggregate value of purchase transactions exceeds given threshold limits)?
Query 3: As per point no. 4.2 - the provisions of Clause 49(VII) as given in Part-B shall be applicable to all prospective transactions. All existing material related party contracts or arrangements as on the date of this circular which are likely to continue beyond March 31, 2015 shall be placed for approval of the shareholders in the first General Meeting subsequent to October 01, 2014. However, a company may choose to get such contracts approved by the shareholders even before October 01, 2014.
From this para, I understand we need to consider the value of only those contracts or arrangement with related party existing on the date of circular i.e. April 17, 2014 and continuing beyond March 2015. But do we have to consider value of each contract or arrangement or need to take the aggregate value of all the contracts or arrangements with the related party?
Request valuable inputs on these especially from those who have practically handled these issues.
Query 1: From the definition of RPT under revised Cl 49–‘a transfer of resources, services or obligations between a company and a related party, regardless of whether a price is charged’, does the expression ‘transfer of resources or obligation’ also cover loans, investments, provision of security or guarantee by a listed entity to its related parties?
Query 2: Material RPT defined as ‘a transaction with a related party shall be considered material if the transaction / transactions to be entered into individually or taken together with previous transactions during a financial year, exceeds five percent of the annual turnover or twenty percent of the net worth of the company as per the last audited financial statements of the company, whichever is higher’
In case, there are transactions with related party of varied nature such as purchase transactions, sale transactions, transactions related to leasing of properties, while identifying material RPTs, do we have to club all kinds of RPTs as under expression used ’taken together’ (i.e. Clubbing sales, purchase, lease transactions together and check if the aggregate value exceeds given threshold limits OR to club RPTs same only similar nature (i.e. Clubbing of only all the purchase transactions and check if the aggregate value of purchase transactions exceeds given threshold limits)?
Query 3: As per point no. 4.2 - the provisions of Clause 49(VII) as given in Part-B shall be applicable to all prospective transactions. All existing material related party contracts or arrangements as on the date of this circular which are likely to continue beyond March 31, 2015 shall be placed for approval of the shareholders in the first General Meeting subsequent to October 01, 2014. However, a company may choose to get such contracts approved by the shareholders even before October 01, 2014.
From this para, I understand we need to consider the value of only those contracts or arrangement with related party existing on the date of circular i.e. April 17, 2014 and continuing beyond March 2015. But do we have to consider value of each contract or arrangement or need to take the aggregate value of all the contracts or arrangements with the related party?
Request valuable inputs on these especially from those who have practically handled these issues.
14 August 2014
Deal Members,
Awaited your kind responses on above mentioned queries
Regards
Chandrashekar K
Awaited your kind responses on above mentioned queries
Regards
Chandrashekar K
22 August 2014
Hi All,
Your kind responses are awaited on the above mentioned queries
Your kind responses are awaited on the above mentioned queries
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Original return filed under Old scheme, can we file updated return under old scheme?
- Payment of Stamp Duty and registartion of documents
- REGARDING AVAILABILITY OF ITC UNDER SECTION 17(5) FOR TRANSPORTATION OF PASSENGER SERVICES
- Tax Audit applicable for fy 24-25
- RECEIPT OF TRAINING FEES FROM FOREIGN STUDENT
- TDS on property 26QB Difference between Amount paid/credited currently(B) and Stamp Duty Value
- GST-Marketing Research Organization
- WRONG BILL ISSUED BY SUPPLIER
- Gst invoice for sale of old car
- Confused regarding applicability of books of accounts and audit
- Disclosure in DPT-3
- Professional Thesis Writers Make My Work Easy
- TCS on car purchase not showing in 26AS even after linking Aadhaar—what should I do?
- RCM Paid on Rented Commercial Property by Restaurant
- Last 3 years GSTR 4 not filed compulsary
- Issue in IMS (Invoice Management System)
- Credit Note Rejection in IMS and GSTR 3B locking
- How to present in Balance sheet as per scheduled III and under which head
- MCA filings and Compliance Practice
- Advance paid and received against Property plant and Equipment
Trending Online Classes
-
Live Course on EPF & ESI Act - Mastercourse(With Govt Certificate)
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan16 June 2025
CAclubindia
