Rectification of GSTR1
This query is : Resolved
25 February 2022
I filed my GSTR1 in F/Y (April 2020 to March 2021), but made a mistake in B to B as GST number of Receipent was wrong ( Gst number of A instead of B). Now I want to correct it with in this month(Feb 2022).
The invoices raised were correct, but reported in wrong GSTN in GSTR1
Kindly advise:
1. Is it allowed to correct the mistake now in month of Feb 2022 (Qtr Jan - March 2022) I am a quarterly filer. If not, what is the alternative choice?
2. Step by step procedure to rectify and report in GSTR1 of current quarter.
The invoices raised were correct, but reported in wrong GSTN in GSTR1
Kindly advise:
1. Is it allowed to correct the mistake now in month of Feb 2022 (Qtr Jan - March 2022) I am a quarterly filer. If not, what is the alternative choice?
2. Step by step procedure to rectify and report in GSTR1 of current quarter.
25 February 2022
1 The time allowed for such correction is GSTR filing due date of September 2021 return.
Now it's not possible for any correction.
Now it's not possible for any correction.
25 February 2022
Revised reply.
We are pleased to share recent judgement of the Bombay High Court. The petitioner made inadvertent errors in GSTR-1 form wherein GSTN number of the recipient of goods was mentioned incorrectly. Leading to denial of credit to the recipient. Time limit for rectification expired. Supplier made representations, however, remained unanswered. The Hon’ble High Court directed to consider the request of the assessee in light of the ruling of the Madras High court in Pentacle Plant Machineries Pvt. Ltd. v/s. GST Council Secretariat - 2021-TIOL-604-HC-MAD-GST and Sun Dye Chem v/s. Assistant Commissioner - 2020-TIOL-1858-HC-MADGST. It may assist similarly placed litigants.
We are pleased to share recent judgement of the Bombay High Court. The petitioner made inadvertent errors in GSTR-1 form wherein GSTN number of the recipient of goods was mentioned incorrectly. Leading to denial of credit to the recipient. Time limit for rectification expired. Supplier made representations, however, remained unanswered. The Hon’ble High Court directed to consider the request of the assessee in light of the ruling of the Madras High court in Pentacle Plant Machineries Pvt. Ltd. v/s. GST Council Secretariat - 2021-TIOL-604-HC-MAD-GST and Sun Dye Chem v/s. Assistant Commissioner - 2020-TIOL-1858-HC-MADGST. It may assist similarly placed litigants.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Itr 1 processing
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- ITR returnFY25-26
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
