Penalty u/s 271(1)(b)
This query is : Resolved
08 February 2015
My Client serve with notice u/s 142(1), asking for All Bank detail and Bank Statement for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008 along with bank summary.
Now my client do not have such detail.
My question is
1) Whether Failure to furnish such document will be liable for penalty u/s 271(1)(b)?
2) Whether AO is justified in calling for such old detail? If yes then is there any remedy to waive such demand?
3) Assessee is Salried Employee so he is not under any obligation to maintain any books or account and document. So how can he produce bank detail of such long period?
Now my client do not have such detail.
My question is
1) Whether Failure to furnish such document will be liable for penalty u/s 271(1)(b)?
2) Whether AO is justified in calling for such old detail? If yes then is there any remedy to waive such demand?
3) Assessee is Salried Employee so he is not under any obligation to maintain any books or account and document. So how can he produce bank detail of such long period?
08 February 2015
01. Yes. It very much will attract 271 (1)
02. Just ensure with A.O. if he has taken prior permission of his higher authority. (Do this tactfully. There is every likelyhood that A.O. has done this and the entire gamut might boomerang....)
03. Please dont waste your time in asking LOGICAL question to yourself like how can he produce bank detail of such long period.? You need to show that in spite of doing genuine effort, bank is NOT able to give the details. Let bank say so....you dont have to say...ok?
Being CA, I am sure you agree the importance of THIRD party evidence.
Your views please.
02. Just ensure with A.O. if he has taken prior permission of his higher authority. (Do this tactfully. There is every likelyhood that A.O. has done this and the entire gamut might boomerang....)
03. Please dont waste your time in asking LOGICAL question to yourself like how can he produce bank detail of such long period.? You need to show that in spite of doing genuine effort, bank is NOT able to give the details. Let bank say so....you dont have to say...ok?
Being CA, I am sure you agree the importance of THIRD party evidence.
Your views please.
08 February 2015
Yup agreed with your advise totally. Thanks
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Itr 1 processing
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- ITR returnFY25-26
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
