Photocopy of register of transfers
This query is : Resolved
28 April 2012
Hello,
What is the penalty for late filing of Maharashtra VAT Return? And is the penalty mandatory or at the discretion of the AO?
What is the penalty for late filing of Maharashtra VAT Return? And is the penalty mandatory or at the discretion of the AO?
28 April 2012
Dear Sir,.
1 of the shareholder of a PVT LTD CO needs photocopy of the whole Register of Transfers. Can it be given?
Kindly mention the provision of Companies Act which govern this matter.
Kindly reply at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards,
Himani
1 of the shareholder of a PVT LTD CO needs photocopy of the whole Register of Transfers. Can it be given?
Kindly mention the provision of Companies Act which govern this matter.
Kindly reply at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards,
Himani
28 April 2012
panalty is Rs.5000/- each for VAT and CST and its mandatory
Message likes :
1 times
28 April 2012
I heard there was a very recent case between STP and the Sales Tax Dept regarding making this penalty as 'discretion of the AO'. Do you have any insights?
28 April 2012
Register of members is dealt with in Section 150 of The Companies Act,1956.
Inspection of the Register of Members is dealt with in Section 163.
Nilesh Shah
Inspection of the Register of Members is dealt with in Section 163.
Nilesh Shah
29 April 2012
Under Mah. VAT, From o1-07-2009 , penalty for non filling or late filling of return is Rs. 5000/-. There is no discretion to STO to levy or not to levy or for quantum of amount. Order is non appeal able {sect. 85(2)}. Penalty is mandatory under provisions.
Writ petitions were filed in Bombay High court challenging that sect. 29(8) ultra vires the constitution and order is not appeallable.Hon’ble High Court passed the order (Sanjay Dresses W.P. 1705 of 2009 dated 6-8-2010 and Ravindra Udyog W.P.1214 of 2010 dated 6-8-2010), It was opined that, penalty order passed without hearing is bad in law, other issues are still open for decision.
Writ petitions were filed in Bombay High court challenging that sect. 29(8) ultra vires the constitution and order is not appeallable.Hon’ble High Court passed the order (Sanjay Dresses W.P. 1705 of 2009 dated 6-8-2010 and Ravindra Udyog W.P.1214 of 2010 dated 6-8-2010), It was opined that, penalty order passed without hearing is bad in law, other issues are still open for decision.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CAPITAL GAIN BASE ON NOTIFICATION
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- ITDS U/S.194T of Firm
- NRI starting business in India
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Journal entry of busniess expenses
- GST not cancelled by tenant
- FORM 141 SDV query
- URGENT-Eligible leaves being shown as 24 days for 3 years Articleship instead of 156 days in 108
- Cash balance limit and property purchases limit
- Taxable or Tax exempt
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
