Income tax assessment proceedings reply
This query is : Resolved
28 December 2017
Please see below reply and suggest any correction if required
With reference to the above the assesse submits as under-
1. Investments in SMS Anamklean Greentec Pvt. Ltd. and SMS Watergrace Mediwaste Pvt. Ltd. transferred to the group companies at cost. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
2. Prior period expenditures not accounted in earlier years, hence expenditures of prior period debited to the profit and loss account in previous year relevant to A.Y 2014-15. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
3. Ledger accounts of C.S.R expenditure attached herewith for your ready reference.
4. Copy of ledger accounts of Interest expenditures attached herewith for your verification.
5. As regards late payment of employee’s contribution to provident fund, it is submitted that the payment has been paid in the same financial year. Therefore the same deserves to be allowed in view of the following judgments –
368 ITR 749 (Bom) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.
366 ITR 001 (Bom) CIT v. Hindustan Organics
With reference to the above the assesse submits as under-
1. Investments in SMS Anamklean Greentec Pvt. Ltd. and SMS Watergrace Mediwaste Pvt. Ltd. transferred to the group companies at cost. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
2. Prior period expenditures not accounted in earlier years, hence expenditures of prior period debited to the profit and loss account in previous year relevant to A.Y 2014-15. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
3. Ledger accounts of C.S.R expenditure attached herewith for your ready reference.
4. Copy of ledger accounts of Interest expenditures attached herewith for your verification.
5. As regards late payment of employee’s contribution to provident fund, it is submitted that the payment has been paid in the same financial year. Therefore the same deserves to be allowed in view of the following judgments –
368 ITR 749 (Bom) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.
366 ITR 001 (Bom) CIT v. Hindustan Organics
28 December 2017
6. Seek an opportunity to explain in person the above facts.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Capital gain from sale of house property
- Current Account Opening for Sole Proprietorship with Udyam Certificate - Zero Turnover
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- TDS on Purchase of Immovable Property by NRI from NRI
- Copyright software
- When TDS on GST applied
- Before GSTAT- APL-02 Vs APL-04
- Annual return in Gst
- Regarding TDS Applicability For Director Remuneration
- Multiple trade mark
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
- Address Change to another state of a Registered Trust with 12AB approval
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
