Income tax assessment proceedings reply
This query is : Resolved
28 December 2017
Please see below reply and suggest any correction if required
With reference to the above the assesse submits as under-
1. Investments in SMS Anamklean Greentec Pvt. Ltd. and SMS Watergrace Mediwaste Pvt. Ltd. transferred to the group companies at cost. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
2. Prior period expenditures not accounted in earlier years, hence expenditures of prior period debited to the profit and loss account in previous year relevant to A.Y 2014-15. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
3. Ledger accounts of C.S.R expenditure attached herewith for your ready reference.
4. Copy of ledger accounts of Interest expenditures attached herewith for your verification.
5. As regards late payment of employee’s contribution to provident fund, it is submitted that the payment has been paid in the same financial year. Therefore the same deserves to be allowed in view of the following judgments –
368 ITR 749 (Bom) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.
366 ITR 001 (Bom) CIT v. Hindustan Organics
With reference to the above the assesse submits as under-
1. Investments in SMS Anamklean Greentec Pvt. Ltd. and SMS Watergrace Mediwaste Pvt. Ltd. transferred to the group companies at cost. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
2. Prior period expenditures not accounted in earlier years, hence expenditures of prior period debited to the profit and loss account in previous year relevant to A.Y 2014-15. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
3. Ledger accounts of C.S.R expenditure attached herewith for your ready reference.
4. Copy of ledger accounts of Interest expenditures attached herewith for your verification.
5. As regards late payment of employee’s contribution to provident fund, it is submitted that the payment has been paid in the same financial year. Therefore the same deserves to be allowed in view of the following judgments –
368 ITR 749 (Bom) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.
366 ITR 001 (Bom) CIT v. Hindustan Organics
28 December 2017
6. Seek an opportunity to explain in person the above facts.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Depreciation Chart Companies Act
- GST Audit whether Govt Companies are exempt?
- PTRC Show Cause Notice on Email
- Unable to File TDS Q2 Return – New TRACES Portal Error
- Capital Gail Exemption Certificate
- Taxation of crypto futures in India Fy 2026- 2027
- Transfer of Physical Stock Between Two Proprietorship Concerns
- Issuing of delivery challan by seller of goods
- MSME disclosure and disallowance
- Not ordinarily resident having partnership income in India and salary in USA is any form to filed be
- GST Treatment of Purchases with GST Paid where Outward Supplies of Manufactured CattleFeed Exempt
- Expert Help Required for TDS Refund 100000 Through TRACES – AY 2022–23
- IMPORT PURCHASE ENTRY PASSED IN BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
- FAST DS 26 Undisclosed Foreign Asset Disclosure Scheme 2026
- Regime change
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- FAST-DS 2026 Under Tax Law - No recourse or support for person declaring via this scheme?
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
