Income tax assessment proceedings reply
This query is : Resolved
28 December 2017
Please see below reply and suggest any correction if required
With reference to the above the assesse submits as under-
1. Investments in SMS Anamklean Greentec Pvt. Ltd. and SMS Watergrace Mediwaste Pvt. Ltd. transferred to the group companies at cost. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
2. Prior period expenditures not accounted in earlier years, hence expenditures of prior period debited to the profit and loss account in previous year relevant to A.Y 2014-15. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
3. Ledger accounts of C.S.R expenditure attached herewith for your ready reference.
4. Copy of ledger accounts of Interest expenditures attached herewith for your verification.
5. As regards late payment of employee’s contribution to provident fund, it is submitted that the payment has been paid in the same financial year. Therefore the same deserves to be allowed in view of the following judgments –
368 ITR 749 (Bom) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.
366 ITR 001 (Bom) CIT v. Hindustan Organics
With reference to the above the assesse submits as under-
1. Investments in SMS Anamklean Greentec Pvt. Ltd. and SMS Watergrace Mediwaste Pvt. Ltd. transferred to the group companies at cost. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
2. Prior period expenditures not accounted in earlier years, hence expenditures of prior period debited to the profit and loss account in previous year relevant to A.Y 2014-15. Copy of ledger accounts attached herewith for your ready reference.
3. Ledger accounts of C.S.R expenditure attached herewith for your ready reference.
4. Copy of ledger accounts of Interest expenditures attached herewith for your verification.
5. As regards late payment of employee’s contribution to provident fund, it is submitted that the payment has been paid in the same financial year. Therefore the same deserves to be allowed in view of the following judgments –
368 ITR 749 (Bom) CIT v. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.
366 ITR 001 (Bom) CIT v. Hindustan Organics
28 December 2017
6. Seek an opportunity to explain in person the above facts.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CAPITAL GAIN BASE ON NOTIFICATION
- Taxable or Tax exempt
- TDS Deducted AY-2013-14 Not Reflected in 26as
- FAST-DS 2026 Under Tax Law - No recourse or support for person declaring via this scheme?
- Demand Outstanding AY 2013-14 TDS Deducted not shown in 26as
- ADVANCE PAYMENT OF ADVOCATE
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- GST rate and HSN code for sale of racing horses
- Condonation . E-Verification of last year return .
- Capital gain on sale and purchase of plot
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
