Save Rs 588 on a 2-Year Ad-Free CAclubindia Pro Membership. Subscribe Now!

Facts of case law required

Save Share

Join Us Follow Us Add as Source

This query is : Open

Report Follow Query Ask a Query

CA Pratik Shahnand

CA Pratik Shahnand (Querist)
Follow

06 November 2013 Can anybody provide me the entire facts of Case Law CCE Vapi vs Jindal Photo Ltd (2009).

CA Vijeta Verma

CA Vijeta Verma (Expert)
Follow

06 November 2013 CCE, Vapi v Jindal Photo Ltd. 2009-TIOL-359-CESTAT-AHM - In the instant case, input service distributor did not take the registration and while transferring the credit, registration no. was not mentioned and the department denied the credit. However, the Tribunal allowed the credit as it was merely a procedural lapse and there was no dispute that the input service was received.

source-ICAI presentation

CA Pratik Shahnand

CA Pratik Shahnand (Querist)
Follow

07 November 2013 Hi Vijeta,

Thanks for your reply. I already had this short note of this case. I actually require the entire facts of this case. If you can provide me with the entire fact and the judgment copy then it will be very helpfull.

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now