Facts of case law required


06 November 2013 Can anybody provide me the entire facts of Case Law CCE Vapi vs Jindal Photo Ltd (2009).

06 November 2013 CCE, Vapi v Jindal Photo Ltd. 2009-TIOL-359-CESTAT-AHM - In the instant case, input service distributor did not take the registration and while transferring the credit, registration no. was not mentioned and the department denied the credit. However, the Tribunal allowed the credit as it was merely a procedural lapse and there was no dispute that the input service was received.

source-ICAI presentation

07 November 2013 Hi Vijeta,

Thanks for your reply. I already had this short note of this case. I actually require the entire facts of this case. If you can provide me with the entire fact and the judgment copy then it will be very helpfull.



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
22 June 2026
Finance Manager- Chartered Accountant

Triveni Turbine Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 09 June 2026
Article Trainee

Numbertree LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Company Secretary - Part time

Shaswat initial support private limited

Ahmedabad

CS

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details