Facts of case law required


This query is : Open 

06 November 2013 Can anybody provide me the entire facts of Case Law CCE Vapi vs Jindal Photo Ltd (2009).

06 November 2013 CCE, Vapi v Jindal Photo Ltd. 2009-TIOL-359-CESTAT-AHM - In the instant case, input service distributor did not take the registration and while transferring the credit, registration no. was not mentioned and the department denied the credit. However, the Tribunal allowed the credit as it was merely a procedural lapse and there was no dispute that the input service was received.

source-ICAI presentation

07 November 2013 Hi Vijeta,

Thanks for your reply. I already had this short note of this case. I actually require the entire facts of this case. If you can provide me with the entire fact and the judgment copy then it will be very helpfull.



You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
14 October 2026
GST & TDS ASSISTANT

AGGARWAL SANJAY & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
02 November 2026
Audit Executive

SRJP & Co LLP

Kochi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 27 October 2026
semi-qualified CA

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Assistant

Malhotra Rajesh & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
07 October 2026
Senior Account Manager

Amplio Invest

Mumbai

M.Com

View Details
Company
10 October 2026
Accounts Associate Level 1

Abic and Mani Chartered Accountants

Kottayam

B.Com

View Details