Contingent liability and unjust enrichment
This query is : Resolved
19 May 2013
we have lost a case in CESTAT and not the case is pending before high court. Now our auditors are saying the we should not show this under contingent but should make provision in the books of accounts because we have lost the case in CESTAT. Now, if we provide this in the books, whether later on our claim can be rejected by invoking unjust enrichment clause or not. Please clarify.
20 May 2013
Not likely as the accounting is based on conservative norms. The notes to accounts can clarify the provision.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Gst reverse charge mechanism to be claimed in the month of payment
- Itr processing refund
- U/S 194 T
- TDS refund Indemnity Bond
- ITC BENEFIT ON BROKRAGE PAID
- PF wage ceiling
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
