Contingent liability and unjust enrichment
This query is : Resolved
19 May 2013
we have lost a case in CESTAT and not the case is pending before high court. Now our auditors are saying the we should not show this under contingent but should make provision in the books of accounts because we have lost the case in CESTAT. Now, if we provide this in the books, whether later on our claim can be rejected by invoking unjust enrichment clause or not. Please clarify.
20 May 2013
Not likely as the accounting is based on conservative norms. The notes to accounts can clarify the provision.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Itr 1 processing
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- ITR validation error - Balance sheet is not filled
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- ITR returnFY25-26
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- ITR 1: Details for showing Exempt Income
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- Registration as Authorised Representative of minor
- Article ship defecit
- Bank Accounts in Balance Sheet for ITR 3
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
