Contingent liability and unjust enrichment
This query is : Resolved
Praveen Nigam
(Querist)
19 May 2013
we have lost a case in CESTAT and not the case is pending before high court. Now our auditors are saying the we should not show this under contingent but should make provision in the books of accounts because we have lost the case in CESTAT. Now, if we provide this in the books, whether later on our claim can be rejected by invoking unjust enrichment clause or not. Please clarify.
Madhukar N Hiregange
(Expert)
20 May 2013
Not likely as the accounting is based on conservative norms. The notes to accounts can clarify the provision.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TDS Challan - change of FY 2025-26 to TY 2026-27
- Gst registered proprietorship firm
- AUDITOR APPOINTMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDING MARCH 27
- TDS on purchase of under construction property from a reseller
- UDIN ISSUE
- SALARY CAN BE CAPITALIZE
- Non filing of I T Returns
- GST Intimation due to Government took possession of Business Premises under PPE Act
- TDS on Fixed Assets purchased
- GST on Renting godown to KFCSC for Storage of Raagi
- How to Handle Active E-Invoices in GST Portal Deleted from Tally?
- IMPORT PURCHASE ENTRY PASSED IN BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
- FAST DS 26 Undisclosed Foreign Asset Disclosure Scheme 2026
- Starting trading business
- Regime change
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
