Confusion about qualification of auditor

This query is : Open

Guest

Guest (Querist)

15 October 2015 As per companies act 2013, the qualification of an auditor is that he should CA as per CA act. Also he is disqualified if he is in employment elsewhere. But it is nowhere written that he should be practising CA. So whether a CA not holding COP can be auditor of company if he is not in employment elsewhere?

CA AnKiT BoHrA (AB)

CA AnKiT BoHrA (AB) (Expert)
Follow

15 October 2015 I hadn't read the said saction, but once again do read that dear... in mah view it must me a member holding COP

Guest

Guest (Querist)

15 October 2015 I have read it. Yes it should be the one holding COP, but i didn't find it in the provision.

Guest

Guest (Querist)

15 October 2015 Provision says that he should be CA with in the meaning of CA act. As per section 2(1)(b) of CA act 1949, CA means, a member of institue.

CA AnKiT BoHrA (AB)

CA AnKiT BoHrA (AB) (Expert)
Follow

16 October 2015 let me check personally dear

Guest

Guest (Querist)

21 October 2015 please make my doubt clear.

You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Summarize this with AI

ChatGPT Perplexity Claude Google AI Grok