Central Excise Refund is Taxable
This query is : Open
28 December 2009
The below text is from Taxguru.com. Any one can send me the full case law in this regard? My mail id is ghanshyam.joshi@epcos.com
Central excise refund is taxable and distinct from profit derived from industrial activity
Dec 4, 2009 Income Tax Case Laws
Tax dept says Central excise refund should be taxed because it is a benefit derived from a government scheme and is distinct from profit derived from industrial activity.IN A decision that could impact companies with operations in the north-east , Jammu & Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh, a tax tribunal in Amritsar has ruled recently that such entities will be liable to pay tax on Central excise duty refunds.
The November 26 decision by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Amritsar will enable income-tax authorities to claim nearly Rs 500 crore from companies operating in these regions.
Companies, such as Balaji Alloys, Raven Bhel and Pee Ell Alloys, moved the income tax appellate tribunal (ITAT) against an income-tax department notice that asked them to cough up the tax. However, the ITAT dismissed their plea late last month. Other companies awaiting an ITAT decision on the issue include Sun Pharma, Kashmir Udyog and Avita Mobile Industries.
Central excise duty refunds are part of a government package to promote industrial development in J & K, northeast states and Himachal Pradesh. Under this scheme, central excise duty a tax on manufacturing paid by the companies is refunded to them.At the same time, these companies in the region are given exemptions from income-tax too. Section 80 IB of the Income-tax Act provides for exemptions from taxation on profits derived from industrial activity in backward areas. In Jammu & Kashmir, Section 80 IB will continue to operate till 2012. In other areas, 100 % exemption is granted for five years after the setting up of an industry and only 25% of the profit derived from industrial profit is taxed for the next five years. Thereafter the profit is taxed according to the prevalent rate.
The tribunal, in an order on November 26, accepted the argument of the I-T department that central excise duty refund is liable to be taxed, even though the companies profit is exempt from taxation under 80 IB.
The department drew a fine line between excise refund and profit generated through industrial activities in these areas. It said Central excise refund cannot be construed as profit derived from industrial activity. The refunds are in fact a benefit derived from a government scheme and distinct from profit derived from industrial activity. Therefore, refunds are not eligible for deductions under Section 80 IB of the Income-tax Act.
Central excise refund is taxable and distinct from profit derived from industrial activity
Dec 4, 2009 Income Tax Case Laws
Tax dept says Central excise refund should be taxed because it is a benefit derived from a government scheme and is distinct from profit derived from industrial activity.IN A decision that could impact companies with operations in the north-east , Jammu & Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh, a tax tribunal in Amritsar has ruled recently that such entities will be liable to pay tax on Central excise duty refunds.
The November 26 decision by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Amritsar will enable income-tax authorities to claim nearly Rs 500 crore from companies operating in these regions.
Companies, such as Balaji Alloys, Raven Bhel and Pee Ell Alloys, moved the income tax appellate tribunal (ITAT) against an income-tax department notice that asked them to cough up the tax. However, the ITAT dismissed their plea late last month. Other companies awaiting an ITAT decision on the issue include Sun Pharma, Kashmir Udyog and Avita Mobile Industries.
Central excise duty refunds are part of a government package to promote industrial development in J & K, northeast states and Himachal Pradesh. Under this scheme, central excise duty a tax on manufacturing paid by the companies is refunded to them.At the same time, these companies in the region are given exemptions from income-tax too. Section 80 IB of the Income-tax Act provides for exemptions from taxation on profits derived from industrial activity in backward areas. In Jammu & Kashmir, Section 80 IB will continue to operate till 2012. In other areas, 100 % exemption is granted for five years after the setting up of an industry and only 25% of the profit derived from industrial profit is taxed for the next five years. Thereafter the profit is taxed according to the prevalent rate.
The tribunal, in an order on November 26, accepted the argument of the I-T department that central excise duty refund is liable to be taxed, even though the companies profit is exempt from taxation under 80 IB.
The department drew a fine line between excise refund and profit generated through industrial activities in these areas. It said Central excise refund cannot be construed as profit derived from industrial activity. The refunds are in fact a benefit derived from a government scheme and distinct from profit derived from industrial activity. Therefore, refunds are not eligible for deductions under Section 80 IB of the Income-tax Act.
28 December 2009
Central excise refund is not taxable.
28 December 2009
Dear Sir,
Do you have the detailed case on this? If yes, please send me the same or post it in this link.
Thank you.
Ghanshyam Joshi
Do you have the detailed case on this? If yes, please send me the same or post it in this link.
Thank you.
Ghanshyam Joshi
28 December 2009
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your reply.
Do you have the detailed case law for this judgement? If yes, can you please send me the same?
Best Regards,
Ghanshyam Joshi
Thank you for your reply.
Do you have the detailed case law for this judgement? If yes, can you please send me the same?
Best Regards,
Ghanshyam Joshi
11 January 2010
I request the experts to give their feedback on this query.
11 January 2010
excise refund is not taxable.
11 January 2010
Thank you Mr. Sisodia,
But can you please give some explanation.
But can you please give some explanation.
11 January 2010
what kind of explanation dear.
11 January 2010
in the contest of the above full facts
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR filing- non tax audit cases- Asstt.Year 2026-2027
- Treatment of Pension ?annuity returns on PMVY
- Soyabean hsn code and gst rate
- Last year TDS Claim
- NON- SUBMISSION OF LLP FORM 3
- Free lancer income
- TDS related Query_Liquidated Damages
- What is provisional receipt number for generation of form 16A
- CA IPCC Registeration in 2012, Is my registration Active or Expired
- AY 26-27 ITR-4 FILING U/S 44-ADA
- Form 27Q Correction statement taking too long to update on IT Portal
- ITR selection for salaries and capital gain less than L
- Showing Gift from relative in ITR for this year
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Standard Deduction claim for EPFO Pension and ICICI Prudential Life Annuity
- Small dealers gst returns filing
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
