capitalisation of exp
This query is : Resolved
08 August 2008
the exchange rate differece relating to foreign currency liability incurred in relation to fixed assets.
1.what is the treatment of above transaction as per co.act
2.wat is its treatment as per IT act.is it an allowable exp.
1.what is the treatment of above transaction as per co.act
2.wat is its treatment as per IT act.is it an allowable exp.
08 August 2008
Companies Act goes by accounting standards.
Income tax is for capitalisation.
The treatment as per should be to capitalise upto the time of acquisition, thereafter charge to p&l.
Income tax is for capitalisation.
The treatment as per should be to capitalise upto the time of acquisition, thereafter charge to p&l.
08 August 2008
schedule VI says it should b taken to carrying amt of fixed asset. But AS 11 Revised 2003 says it should b charged to P&L Account which is mandatory in nature. but as AS 11 is in conflict with law as schdule VI has not yet revised in this case auditor will not qualify his report for not complying with AS 11.
and as per income tax act section 43A it shall be taken to carrying amount of F.asset hence to b capitalised
and as per income tax act section 43A it shall be taken to carrying amount of F.asset hence to b capitalised
08 August 2008
AS-11 issued under Companies accounting standard rules, 2006 says method prescribed in the standard should be followed irrespective of the treatment suggested in Schedule VI of the companies act. Hence, it should be expensed.
(Companies like Reliance, Airtel went on capitalising and reported that if such exchange difference was taken to P&L their profits would have come down by so many crores. Refer "The Business Line" - 06.08.08(Front Page))
So the treatment is it should be expensed. But they have questioned the validity of the standard.
Under Income Tax Act, Sec 43A should be followed and remember, that section talks only about the payment and not the mere restatement.
(Companies like Reliance, Airtel went on capitalising and reported that if such exchange difference was taken to P&L their profits would have come down by so many crores. Refer "The Business Line" - 06.08.08(Front Page))
So the treatment is it should be expensed. But they have questioned the validity of the standard.
Under Income Tax Act, Sec 43A should be followed and remember, that section talks only about the payment and not the mere restatement.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Fixe term employment
- Is any professional CA is here please reply
- Putting a heading on received mail
- Section 50-fixed asset-->building ceases to exist
- Experts need help
- Gift Received from nonblood relative
- Tax Audit u/s 44AB for Transport Business A proprietorship is engaged in transportation business and
- EXPORT BILL UNDER LUT FREIGHT CHARGE INCLUED IN INVOICE IT LIABLE TO TAX
- Reprocessing of rectification order AY 2025-26
- FTS Taxable under 115A
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- STATUTORY AUDIT OF A SMALL PRIVATE COMPANY INCORPORATED ON 28.03.2025
- Guidance Needed: Linking Multiple Form 26QB Payments and Responding to ITD Defaulter Notice
- How to pay remaining amount of TDS after due date?
- Resigning a auditor from the company for misconduct
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
