appointment of auditor
This query is : Resolved
03 October 2010
Dear Sir(s),
Can a relative of a director be appointed as an auditor? If yes, what are the conditions to be fulfilled?
Can a relative of a director be appointed as an auditor? If yes, what are the conditions to be fulfilled?
04 October 2010
Sir(s), after reading Section 6 as well as Schedule -IA to the Companies Act 1956,the following comes to my mind:
SISTER'S HUSBAND is Defined as a relative but WIFE'S BROTHER has not been defined as a relative.
Hence, i come to the conclusion:
"If Jija is a director, Saala is not a relative and hence Saala can become an auditor;
but if Saala is a director,Jija becomes a relative and hence Jija cannot become an auditor"
Is my conclusion correct?
SISTER'S HUSBAND is Defined as a relative but WIFE'S BROTHER has not been defined as a relative.
Hence, i come to the conclusion:
"If Jija is a director, Saala is not a relative and hence Saala can become an auditor;
but if Saala is a director,Jija becomes a relative and hence Jija cannot become an auditor"
Is my conclusion correct?
14 July 2024
Your analysis regarding the appointment of auditors under the Companies Act and the definition of relatives is quite astute. Let’s clarify the situation based on the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 (which has been superseded by the Companies Act, 2013, but the principles are generally similar):
### Definition of Relatives under Companies Act, 1956
1. **Relatives Defined:**
- The term "relative" under Section 6 of the Companies Act, 1956 includes:
- Spouse
- Brother or sister
- Any lineal ascendant or descendant
- Any lineal ascendant or descendant of a spouse
- Spouse of any of the persons mentioned above
2. **Specific Relationship:**
- As per your understanding:
- "SISTER'S HUSBAND" (Jija) is a relative.
- "WIFE'S BROTHER" (Saala) is not explicitly mentioned as a relative under the definition provided.
### Conclusion Regarding Auditor Appointment
Based on the understanding of relative definitions under the Companies Act, 1956:
- If Jija (SISTER'S HUSBAND) is a director, and Saala (WIFE'S BROTHER) is not considered a relative under the Act, then Saala can indeed be appointed as an auditor because there is no conflict of interest or prohibition under the relative definition.
- Conversely, if Saala (WIFE'S BROTHER) is a director, Jija (SISTER'S HUSBAND) would fall under the definition of a relative. According to the Companies Act, relatives of a director cannot be appointed as auditors due to potential conflicts of interest.
### Clarification under Companies Act, 2013
While the Companies Act, 2013 has updated provisions, including broader definitions of relatives and stricter guidelines on auditor independence, the fundamental principle remains similar regarding the appointment of relatives as auditors.
### Conclusion
Your conclusion is generally correct under the Companies Act, 1956. It’s important to verify specific provisions under the Companies Act, 2013 or consult with a legal expert for precise guidance, as the definitions and regulations may have evolved since the enactment of the 1956 Act.
If you need further clarification or have specific scenarios to discuss, it may be beneficial to seek advice from a qualified legal professional who can provide detailed interpretation and application of the current Companies Act provisions.
Best regards,
### Definition of Relatives under Companies Act, 1956
1. **Relatives Defined:**
- The term "relative" under Section 6 of the Companies Act, 1956 includes:
- Spouse
- Brother or sister
- Any lineal ascendant or descendant
- Any lineal ascendant or descendant of a spouse
- Spouse of any of the persons mentioned above
2. **Specific Relationship:**
- As per your understanding:
- "SISTER'S HUSBAND" (Jija) is a relative.
- "WIFE'S BROTHER" (Saala) is not explicitly mentioned as a relative under the definition provided.
### Conclusion Regarding Auditor Appointment
Based on the understanding of relative definitions under the Companies Act, 1956:
- If Jija (SISTER'S HUSBAND) is a director, and Saala (WIFE'S BROTHER) is not considered a relative under the Act, then Saala can indeed be appointed as an auditor because there is no conflict of interest or prohibition under the relative definition.
- Conversely, if Saala (WIFE'S BROTHER) is a director, Jija (SISTER'S HUSBAND) would fall under the definition of a relative. According to the Companies Act, relatives of a director cannot be appointed as auditors due to potential conflicts of interest.
### Clarification under Companies Act, 2013
While the Companies Act, 2013 has updated provisions, including broader definitions of relatives and stricter guidelines on auditor independence, the fundamental principle remains similar regarding the appointment of relatives as auditors.
### Conclusion
Your conclusion is generally correct under the Companies Act, 1956. It’s important to verify specific provisions under the Companies Act, 2013 or consult with a legal expert for precise guidance, as the definitions and regulations may have evolved since the enactment of the 1956 Act.
If you need further clarification or have specific scenarios to discuss, it may be beneficial to seek advice from a qualified legal professional who can provide detailed interpretation and application of the current Companies Act provisions.
Best regards,
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- TDS CREDIT MISMATCHING
- Buy back of shares u/s69
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- Tax Audit Applicability – Newly Formed Partnership Firm with Profit Below 6%/8%
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- TDS AND ITR ISSUE
- URGENT-Eligible leaves being shown as 24 days for 3 years Articleship instead of 156 days in 108
- ADDITION OF CHALLAN IN TDS RETURN FORM 140
- TODAY INCOME TAX SITE IS NOT WORKING ANY OFFICIAL EXTENSION
- GST Rate for Catering Services
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
- Tax Demand of ₹4,650 for AY 2026-27
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
