Advance paid against the project
This query is : Resolved
29 May 2010
I am doing audit of a pvt company,Company has been paying to its group company as advance against the project, and there is no as such any agreement regarding this. This is only a inter company fund mnagement
is there any dislouser requirement?
is there any dislouser requirement?
29 May 2010
Payer: Compnay A
Payee: Company B
The amount paid by A to B cannot be treated as an advance, since the project is of B and not A, it can be treated as a Secured/Unsecured Loan based on the circumstance of the case;
Even though both the companies are of the same group one can not say that there should not be any any agreement, each company has its seperate entity and treat all the transactions in similar parlance so there should be an agreement;
Disclosure will come in Related Party AS-18 of the transactions made during the period.
Feel free to make further discussion
Thank You
Payee: Company B
The amount paid by A to B cannot be treated as an advance, since the project is of B and not A, it can be treated as a Secured/Unsecured Loan based on the circumstance of the case;
Even though both the companies are of the same group one can not say that there should not be any any agreement, each company has its seperate entity and treat all the transactions in similar parlance so there should be an agreement;
Disclosure will come in Related Party AS-18 of the transactions made during the period.
Feel free to make further discussion
Thank You
Message likes :
1 times
29 May 2010
In this case, ITO can treat it deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e).
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITDS U/S.194T of Firm
- Difference between Date of Payment and Date of Deduction?
- Unregistered suppliers utility
- Non-Compliance documents have not been submitted by the contractors debited
- EXPORT COMMERCIAL INVOICE HSN CODE
- Bank details not Visible on Traces Portal
- FCRA 6 E- Intimation
- Same demand raised for original as well as rectification request return
- Sale of property held jointly with a non resident Indian
- TDS ON EMAIL DOMAIN SERVICE BILL
- CAPITAL GAIN BASE ON NOTIFICATION
- Demand Outstanding AY 2013-14 TDS Deducted not shown in 26as
- Eway bill not cancelled within 24 hous what can be due
- TDS Deducted AY-2013-14 Not Reflected in 26as
- RCM @ 5% on Hamali charges, Transport Charges, Unloading charges we take ITC or not
- CALCULATION OF DEFFERED TAX - OP BL IS DTL & CURRET IT DTA
- LLP audit under companies act
- Experienced CA recommendation from Kolkata for FNO return filing
- Interest Reporting in Form 168
- Sales of goods of amount Rs77 lakhs to a party
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
