Section 255 companies ACt 1956
This query is : Resolved
13 February 2009
A listed company Board comprises of:
1MD,1ED,3 Non-Ed(2 are independent).
Total board Strength is 5.
Md, ED- resolution appoints them for period of 1 year,
Artciles say " MD/WD shall not be liable to retirement by rotation."
Is Section 255 complied??
1MD,1ED,3 Non-Ed(2 are independent).
Total board Strength is 5.
Md, ED- resolution appoints them for period of 1 year,
Artciles say " MD/WD shall not be liable to retirement by rotation."
Is Section 255 complied??
24 February 2009
Yes, sec 255 is complied.But the remaining 3 directors have to retire by rotation in order to fulfill proviso of sec. 255.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CAPITAL GAIN REDEVELOPED FLAT
- CLOSING STOCK QUERY
- REGARDING ITR FILING QUESTION
- Requirement under FEMA &RBI
- Multiple payment of self assessment tax for A Y 2025-2026
- Gst reverse charge mechanism to be claimed in the month of payment
- Taxation on Old jewellery sold
- PF wage ceiling
- Itr processing refund
- Error in uploading Form 10BD
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
- Query regarding reporting of exempt foreign remuneration in ITR (AY 2026-27)
- FEMA/RBI treatment — Amazon.ca arbitrage (US buy, Canada sell, goods never enter India)
- Goods return by customer
- INWARD REMITTANCE FOREIGN
- CPC and SAC
- Account freezed for Ineligible ITC Scrutiny for GST Annual Return
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
