Related Party Transactions
This query is : Resolved
09 April 2009
During the year a company has become subsidiary from JV. As on March it is subsidiary
How should the transactions be recognised as per related party.
Whether it should be shown partly in JV and partly in subsidiary or fully in subsidiary.
How should the transactions be recognised as per related party.
Whether it should be shown partly in JV and partly in subsidiary or fully in subsidiary.
09 April 2009
Upto the date of conversion into subsidiary it should be shown under JV.
And after it became subsidiary it should be shown under subsidiary.
And after it became subsidiary it should be shown under subsidiary.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Capital gain from sale of house property
- TDS on Purchase of Immovable Property by NRI from NRI
- Current Account Opening for Sole Proprietorship with Udyam Certificate - Zero Turnover
- INTEREST APPLICABLE ON ITC REVERSAL PORTION
- Before GSTAT- APL-02 Vs APL-04
- Annual return in Gst
- Transporter Declaration form
- Multiple trade mark
- FORM 26A APPLICABILITY
- LC charges in relation to Asset purchased should be Capitalised ?
- Opting our of sec 44AD
- GST Treatment of Insurance Commission for Existing GST Holder
- Cash gift by grand mother to her grand daughter
- Tax amount diff in Gstr1 and 3B in tax compare reports
- Tds on GST in connection with sale to public company
- Restoration of certificate of practice
- Regarding change in correspondence address in SSP portal
- No Compliences after incorporation
- USEFUL LIFE OF USED/SECOND HAND COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
- Claiming TDS deducted by builder on Hardship compensation and Corpus
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
