Related Party Transactions
This query is : Resolved
09 April 2009
During the year a company has become subsidiary from JV. As on March it is subsidiary
How should the transactions be recognised as per related party.
Whether it should be shown partly in JV and partly in subsidiary or fully in subsidiary.
How should the transactions be recognised as per related party.
Whether it should be shown partly in JV and partly in subsidiary or fully in subsidiary.
09 April 2009
Upto the date of conversion into subsidiary it should be shown under JV.
And after it became subsidiary it should be shown under subsidiary.
And after it became subsidiary it should be shown under subsidiary.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- STCG....................................................
- AMOUNT RECEIVED UNDER COMPULOSRY ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND
- Sales return eway bill
- TAN for Partnership
- LTCG for Assmt year 26-27
- E way bill for tractors
- Suggestions required for income tax filing-software (FY 2025-26)
- Loan by Partnership Firm
- Plot of land. Cost of Acquisition
- Is E Way Bill Valid If Transport ID Not Mentioned in PART A But Vehicle details mentioned in PART B
- Section 54F - Exemption on LTCG in 2026 for HP purchased in 2023
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- CG after sale of flat
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- Nomination of Bank for refund in itr 2
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
- GST Refund_RFD-01
- Form10BD was uploaded successfully without any Error but after 24 hours, Form10BE are not available
- Annexure B utility for GST Refund
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
