Related Party Transactions
This query is : Resolved
09 April 2009
During the year a company has become subsidiary from JV. As on March it is subsidiary
How should the transactions be recognised as per related party.
Whether it should be shown partly in JV and partly in subsidiary or fully in subsidiary.
How should the transactions be recognised as per related party.
Whether it should be shown partly in JV and partly in subsidiary or fully in subsidiary.
09 April 2009
Upto the date of conversion into subsidiary it should be shown under JV.
And after it became subsidiary it should be shown under subsidiary.
And after it became subsidiary it should be shown under subsidiary.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- TDS on property - Form 141 query
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Type of Capital Gain
- Exiting partner in partnership firm in gst portal
- TDS _Long term Capital Gain ref.sec 214 Table 2
- Loss of interest in PF transfer from EPFO to Trust
- IT returns for fresh job holders
- Traces submitting correction statement error
- ITR-Capital Gain
- Housing Society-ITR5
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
- 44ad eligble money lending interest
- Taxation in the hands of Landowner under JDA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
