intrepretation of "more clearly evident"?


This query is : Resolved 

16 March 2011 i was reading acccounting standards and came across this sentence in as-10.

in case assets are acquired for non monetary consideration then fmv of assets acquired or given up whichever is more clearly evident should be taken as cost of the asset.

My doubtfmv of asset acquired - 500000
fmv of asset given up-450000

what will be the cost of the asset ??

16 March 2011 well as per as--10 is that u can took the cost of asset which is more clearly evident . well in such cases took the value of lower one, because if u took higher one u got more dep this result in letter from dept. kkk

practically this works like this


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
19 September 2026
Finance Manager

Mugdha Art Studio

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 11 September 2026
Audit Executive

RBSM Corporate Advisors Private Limited

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
25 August 2026
Senior Accountant

MG Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 September 2026
Article Assistant

MANUJ SHARMA AND COMPANY

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
27 August 2026
ACCOUNTANT

CHARUPREETI & CO

Noida

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 September 2026
Freelance Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Audit Executive

Thammana & Associates

Srikakulam

B.Com

View Details