Following the provisions of 196 for md in private company

This query is : Resolved 

Avatar

Querist : Anonymous

Profile Image
Querist : Anonymous (Querist)
19 November 2015 Dear Experts,

As per the Companies Act, 2013, there is no requirement of appointing CFO, or MD or WTD in private Cos.
Still, many companies do so, and also file the appointment in the ROC, and follow procedure under Section 196 (like term of appointment 5 years, approval by members at subsequent general meeting etc.)
Why is this done?

23 November 2015 If you see, most of the such cases are for Whole-time Directors.
The reason is, if a Director is receiving salary from a company, then he should be treated as 'WTD', by virtue of receiving salary.

Section 196 is only for MD and WTD.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 27 June 2026
CA Articled Trainee And Paid Assistant

SKAA & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
29 June 2026
Accountant (Finance & Compliance)

TRIEYEZ

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
04 June 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Goyal Puneet & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details