FBT - Min. number of Employees
This query is : Resolved
13 March 2009
Dear Sir,
It is a known fact that in case there is no employee in Company FBT cannot be levied however I have following two queries and sought expert views on the same :
1. Will a Company be held liable for FBT on expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} in case it has just one employee on the rolls of the Company?(as the definition used says "Company should have employees in India"
2. The Company has incurred some expenses which are liable for FBT but didn’t had any employee. Subsequently it appoints one/two employee in the Company. Whether FBT will be levied on the expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} incurred from the date the employee joins the organisation or from the first date of the financial year?
It is a known fact that in case there is no employee in Company FBT cannot be levied however I have following two queries and sought expert views on the same :
1. Will a Company be held liable for FBT on expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} in case it has just one employee on the rolls of the Company?(as the definition used says "Company should have employees in India"
2. The Company has incurred some expenses which are liable for FBT but didn’t had any employee. Subsequently it appoints one/two employee in the Company. Whether FBT will be levied on the expenses {of the type covered by Sec. 115WB (2)} incurred from the date the employee joins the organisation or from the first date of the financial year?
13 March 2009
Even if one employee is there then FBT will be attracted.
If no employee is there at the time of spending the expenditure then that expenditure will not attract FBT. But if no employees are there to whom this expenses has been spent will be question of ITO which you should be in a poistion to answer.
If no employee is there at the time of spending the expenditure then that expenditure will not attract FBT. But if no employees are there to whom this expenses has been spent will be question of ITO which you should be in a poistion to answer.
16 March 2009
Dear Sir,
Thanx for your advice, I hope Directors of the Company are not considered as Employees for the purpose of FBT. So if Director of a Company making an expense in the nature of for example Entertainment Expense I think it will not attract FBT.
Thanx for your advice, I hope Directors of the Company are not considered as Employees for the purpose of FBT. So if Director of a Company making an expense in the nature of for example Entertainment Expense I think it will not attract FBT.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- CLOSING STOCK QUERY
- Loss of interest in PF transfer from EPFO to Trust
- Sale of Mutual Funds In Diffirent Financial Years
- Query regarding Item 61/62/63 vs Item 64 in ITR-3
- Rent claimed on building given on permissive possession basis
- Can a single LLP in India legally operate multiple unrelated businesses (Travel, Cloud Kitchen, Ecom
- Error in uploading Form 10BD
- Traces submitting correction statement error
- Residential status of non resident
- ITR 44AD SECTION
- DUE DATE FOR ITR FILING
- Concept of Vendor and customner reconciliation
- Mistake in e-invoice identified after 24 hours
- EXPORT PAYMENT
- NRI ITR2 account in 2025-26.
- Query regarding reporting of exempt foreign remuneration in ITR (AY 2026-27)
- FEMA/RBI treatment — Amazon.ca arbitrage (US buy, Canada sell, goods never enter India)
- Goods return by customer
- INWARD REMITTANCE FOREIGN
- CPC and SAC
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
