Deemed dividend
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
04 November 2014
A pvt ltd ,b pvt ltd,c pvt ltd had taken loan from ganpati pvt ltd in which they had shareholdins of 9% each> these companies went in merger and formed f ltd. Due to merger the % shareholdings of f ltd in Ganpati PVT LTD increased to 27%. whether provision of sec 2(22)(e) attracted?
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
05 November 2014
kindly answer the above querry
20 July 2024
In the scenario described, where A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd each had a 9% shareholding in Ganpati Pvt Ltd, and then merged to form F Ltd, which resulted in F Ltd collectively holding 27% in Ganpati Pvt Ltd, the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 needs to be examined carefully.
### Understanding Section 2(22)(e)
Section 2(22)(e) deals with the concept of deemed dividends. It states that any payment by a company (not being a company in which the public are substantially interested) which results in the benefit or advantage, directly or indirectly, to its shareholders or their associates, is deemed to be a dividend. The section specifically includes loans and advances made by a company to its shareholders or their associates.
### Application to the Scenario
1. **Loan from Ganpati Pvt Ltd**: A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd each took a loan from Ganpati Pvt Ltd.
2. **Merger**: A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd merged to form F Ltd.
3. **Increased Shareholding**: Post-merger, F Ltd collectively holds 27% in Ganpati Pvt Ltd.
Now, the key question is whether the transaction (i.e., the loan taken by A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd from Ganpati Pvt Ltd) can be deemed to have resulted in a benefit or advantage to the shareholders (now shareholders of F Ltd) under Section 2(22)(e).
### Analysis
- **Benefit or Advantage**: Typically, the courts have interpreted 'benefit or advantage' broadly. In this case, the merger leading to an increase in the collective shareholding of F Ltd in Ganpati Pvt Ltd from 27% could potentially be seen as conferring a benefit or advantage indirectly to the shareholders of F Ltd.
- **Deemed Dividend**: Given that the loan from Ganpati Pvt Ltd was initially taken by A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd (which became part of F Ltd after the merger), and the subsequent increase in collective shareholding, there is a possibility that Section 2(22)(e) might apply.
### Conclusion
To determine conclusively whether Section 2(22)(e) is attracted in this scenario, a detailed analysis of the nature of the loan, the timing of its origination, the merger process, and its impact on the shareholding in Ganpati Pvt Ltd would be necessary. It is recommended to consult with a tax expert or legal advisor who can review all relevant details and provide specific advice tailored to the circumstances of the merger and the applicable provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
### Understanding Section 2(22)(e)
Section 2(22)(e) deals with the concept of deemed dividends. It states that any payment by a company (not being a company in which the public are substantially interested) which results in the benefit or advantage, directly or indirectly, to its shareholders or their associates, is deemed to be a dividend. The section specifically includes loans and advances made by a company to its shareholders or their associates.
### Application to the Scenario
1. **Loan from Ganpati Pvt Ltd**: A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd each took a loan from Ganpati Pvt Ltd.
2. **Merger**: A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd merged to form F Ltd.
3. **Increased Shareholding**: Post-merger, F Ltd collectively holds 27% in Ganpati Pvt Ltd.
Now, the key question is whether the transaction (i.e., the loan taken by A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd from Ganpati Pvt Ltd) can be deemed to have resulted in a benefit or advantage to the shareholders (now shareholders of F Ltd) under Section 2(22)(e).
### Analysis
- **Benefit or Advantage**: Typically, the courts have interpreted 'benefit or advantage' broadly. In this case, the merger leading to an increase in the collective shareholding of F Ltd in Ganpati Pvt Ltd from 27% could potentially be seen as conferring a benefit or advantage indirectly to the shareholders of F Ltd.
- **Deemed Dividend**: Given that the loan from Ganpati Pvt Ltd was initially taken by A Pvt Ltd, B Pvt Ltd, and C Pvt Ltd (which became part of F Ltd after the merger), and the subsequent increase in collective shareholding, there is a possibility that Section 2(22)(e) might apply.
### Conclusion
To determine conclusively whether Section 2(22)(e) is attracted in this scenario, a detailed analysis of the nature of the loan, the timing of its origination, the merger process, and its impact on the shareholding in Ganpati Pvt Ltd would be necessary. It is recommended to consult with a tax expert or legal advisor who can review all relevant details and provide specific advice tailored to the circumstances of the merger and the applicable provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Depreciation Chart Companies Act
- GST Audit whether Govt Companies are exempt?
- PTRC Show Cause Notice on Email
- Accounting treatment of AMC alongwith the purchase of Laptop
- Unable to File TDS Q2 Return – New TRACES Portal Error
- Capital Gail Exemption Certificate
- Taxation of crypto futures in India Fy 2026- 2027
- EPF ECR NEW RULES Sep 17th 2026
- Not ordinarily resident having partnership income in India and salary in USA is any form to filed be
- Issuing of delivery challan by seller of goods
- GST Treatment of Purchases with GST Paid where Outward Supplies of Manufactured CattleFeed Exempt
- Expert Help Required for TDS Refund 100000 Through TRACES – AY 2022–23
- IMPORT PURCHASE ENTRY PASSED IN BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
- FAST DS 26 Undisclosed Foreign Asset Disclosure Scheme 2026
- Regime change
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- FAST-DS 2026 Under Tax Law - No recourse or support for person declaring via this scheme?
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
