Capital gain tax liability on auction sale
This query is : Resolved
02 July 2014
dear experts,
Mr. A (managing director of a company) mortgage his house as guarantee to bank against loan of Rs. 11 crore.
on non payment of outstanding loan bank auctioned Mr. A house and realised Rs. 7.5 Crore
now please tell what is the tax liability of Mr. A?
in Sale agreement Seller is Bank and Purchaser deducted and deposited the TDS in Mr. A account.?
please suggest how to determine tax liability
Mr. A (managing director of a company) mortgage his house as guarantee to bank against loan of Rs. 11 crore.
on non payment of outstanding loan bank auctioned Mr. A house and realised Rs. 7.5 Crore
now please tell what is the tax liability of Mr. A?
in Sale agreement Seller is Bank and Purchaser deducted and deposited the TDS in Mr. A account.?
please suggest how to determine tax liability
05 July 2014
Tax Liability of Mr. A is as under:
Full Value of Consideration Rs. 7.5 Crore
Less: Cost/Indexed Cost of Acq. xx
STCG OR LTCG
Less: Tax Deducted at source
Full Value of Consideration Rs. 7.5 Crore
Less: Cost/Indexed Cost of Acq. xx
STCG OR LTCG
Less: Tax Deducted at source
Message likes :
1 times
05 July 2014
sir but in above case Mr.A (guarantor) didn't receive anything as a consideration?
please clarify
please clarify
05 July 2014
Though the Mr. A was only guarantor, he was undisputed owner of the property while creating the mortgage in the favor of the bank. Hence, mere for non receipt of sale consideration Mr.A can not escape from the capital Gain Tax.
In CIT Vs. Roshanbabu Mohammed Hussein Merchant,Bombay High Court rejected the contention of the Assessee for claiming CG Tax arising on sale of Land exempt from LTCG.
In CIT Vs. Roshanbabu Mohammed Hussein Merchant,Bombay High Court rejected the contention of the Assessee for claiming CG Tax arising on sale of Land exempt from LTCG.
07 July 2014
sir but there are delhi high court and kerala high court decisions in the same case that in case of guarantor there was no sales consideration received by the guarantor (neither in money nor by any reduction in liability)therefore there's no capital gain tax liability..
sir isn't it very harsh for assessee, in the above case assessee didn't receive even a single penny and as per bombay high court judgement cited by you assesse have to pay near about Rs. 1.2 crore capital gain tax.
sir isn't it very harsh for assessee, in the above case assessee didn't receive even a single penny and as per bombay high court judgement cited by you assesse have to pay near about Rs. 1.2 crore capital gain tax.
08 July 2014
It may possible that, two different courts may announce a different verdicts on alike case matters.Sometimes High courts may refer the past case verdicts on similar subject or sometimes may study the entire case again for reaching the final conclusion and courts have their own discretion to study the case and announce the verdicts and therefore these decisions may vary.
Secondly, Could not have Guarantor paid the Capital Gain Tax, if he had sold the same property instead of Bank? Guarantor has not received single pie because he has entered in the legal agreement and he was aware of the fact that he may not get anything if the bank sells the property on being failure of borrower for repayment of obligations.
Third and important, he was a undisputed owner of the property at the time of entering into such agreement. Mere standing as a guarantor and not receiving of money does not change this fact.
Finally, It is not necessary that amount should be actually received for being taxed it may be received or receivable as per the definition U/S 48
Yes, it was very harsh for the assessee as the amount was huge and unfortunately there is no such provision in the which exempts the capital gain tax in such cases except in reverse mortgage.
Secondly, Could not have Guarantor paid the Capital Gain Tax, if he had sold the same property instead of Bank? Guarantor has not received single pie because he has entered in the legal agreement and he was aware of the fact that he may not get anything if the bank sells the property on being failure of borrower for repayment of obligations.
Third and important, he was a undisputed owner of the property at the time of entering into such agreement. Mere standing as a guarantor and not receiving of money does not change this fact.
Finally, It is not necessary that amount should be actually received for being taxed it may be received or receivable as per the definition U/S 48
Yes, it was very harsh for the assessee as the amount was huge and unfortunately there is no such provision in the which exempts the capital gain tax in such cases except in reverse mortgage.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- About TDS & Income Tax
- Pass word to open justification report for Q1 for FY 2026-27
- Scrutiny and reopening of past returns
- Section 194JA & JB Income which ITR Form to use
- PPF interest-As Exempt Income disclosure
- Under construction property in ITR
- Building tax payment deduction in rental Income
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- Booth for sales promotion
- GST ON TRAVELLING BILLS
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
- 44ad eligble money lending interest
- Delisted shares sold in off market/ Rebate u/s87A
- In Exports Sales HSN details where to fill
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
