audit compulsory or not?
This query is : Open
09 June 2011
MY CLIENT IS A RATION AS WELL AS NON-RATION DEALER. HIS TOTAL TURNOVER DOES NOT EXCEED 60 LAKHS FOR A.Y.2011-12. HIS RATION SALES IS APPROX 40% OF TOTAL TURNOVER. IS HE LIABLE FOR AUDIT U/S 44AB IF HIS NET PROFIT MARGIN IS LESS THAN 8%?
ALSO WILL HE BE COVERED UNDER 44AD?
ALSO WILL HE BE COVERED UNDER 44AD?
09 June 2011
If the turnover does not exceed 60 lakhs he falls under section 44AD, but if profit is less than 8% of turnover than he has to get his accounts audited under section 44AB provided his total income exceeds minimum liable to tax.
09 June 2011
if the books of accounts are not audited u/s 44AB , will he be liable for penalty if he is covered u/s 44AD and not showing income of 8%?
09 June 2011
If the accounts are not audited, I think a presumptive assessment order will be passed taking 8% profit on turnover.
10 June 2011
ok
so do you mean he will not be liable for penalty for not auditing?
so do you mean he will not be liable for penalty for not auditing?
11 June 2011
Dear Nirav,
He will be lible for penalty of a sum equal to one-half per cent of the total sales, turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, in business, or of the gross receipts in profession, in such previous year or years or a sum of one hundred fifty thousand rupees, whichever is less.(U/s 271B.)
This is because Sec 44AD direct assesse to provision of Sec 44AB for the purpose of Audit. It means the provision of Sec 44AB shall apply and conseauence of this the assessee shall be lible for a PENALTY U/S 271B.
With Regards,
He will be lible for penalty of a sum equal to one-half per cent of the total sales, turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, in business, or of the gross receipts in profession, in such previous year or years or a sum of one hundred fifty thousand rupees, whichever is less.(U/s 271B.)
This is because Sec 44AD direct assesse to provision of Sec 44AB for the purpose of Audit. It means the provision of Sec 44AB shall apply and conseauence of this the assessee shall be lible for a PENALTY U/S 271B.
With Regards,
21 June 2011
THANK U SIR
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- About TDS & Income Tax
- Scrutiny and reopening of past returns
- Pass word to open justification report for Q1 for FY 2026-27
- Section 194JA & JB Income which ITR Form to use
- PPF interest-As Exempt Income disclosure
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Type of Capital Gain
- Booth for sales promotion
- Difference in GSTR3B system generated which is correct and actual Payment it asks
- GST ON TRAVELLING BILLS
- TDS on Rent received on redevelopment of building
- Tax on Deemed Capital Gain
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
- 44ad eligble money lending interest
- Taxation in the hands of Landowner under JDA
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
