Appointment of director
This query is : Resolved
06 December 2011
Regards,
Question) whether a shareholder of a private company is entitled to give notice at the AGM for his appointment as Director of the company as 257 is not applicable for pvt. companies.
what is the resort to the company for such notice by the shareholder to the company. and the company do not wish to appoint him as the director. as majority of the shareholding is with the company.
please guide
Regards
Abhijit
Regards,
Question) whether a shareholder of a private company is entitled to give notice at the AGM for his appointment as Director of the company as 257 is not applicable for pvt. companies.
what is the resort to the company for such notice by the shareholder to the company. and the company do not wish to appoint him as the director. as majority of the shareholding is with the company.
please guide
Regards
Abhijit
06 December 2011
Section 257 is not applicable to private companies. They will be governed by the provisions in their articles.
06 December 2011
Thanks Mitesh..
what would be the consequences if a shareholder in a private company holding approx 26% shares after giving notice to the company for his appointment if not appointed.
whether it will affect minority interest.??
there are only two shareholders in the company. other shareholder is holding the rest of shares.
plz give suitable ans to my query.
thanks and regards
abhijit
what would be the consequences if a shareholder in a private company holding approx 26% shares after giving notice to the company for his appointment if not appointed.
whether it will affect minority interest.??
there are only two shareholders in the company. other shareholder is holding the rest of shares.
plz give suitable ans to my query.
thanks and regards
abhijit
06 December 2011
As you know section 257 is not applicable to pvt companies, company is not bound to respond to the request of the shareholder. Company can out rightly reject his request.
In your case rejecting the request would not be equal to damaging the minority right. On the basis of minority interest you can not compel a company to do anything you want.
RG
In your case rejecting the request would not be equal to damaging the minority right. On the basis of minority interest you can not compel a company to do anything you want.
RG
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- ITR 2 Short Term gain & Long term gain
- Off Market debit and credit transaction
- Itr 1 processing
- Reporting Income under Section 44ADA
- ITR validation error - Balance sheet is not filled
- INCOME TAX ON REDEVELOPEMENT OF FLAT
- Short Term Capital gain on shares bought and sold after 2018 onwards
- Share accounting-->fifo - capital gain - period as per fifo?
- ITR returnFY25-26
- Form 10E u/s 89(1). Need clarification because experts opinions differ !!!!
- Registration as Authorised Representative of minor
- Article ship defecit
- Bank Accounts in Balance Sheet for ITR 3
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
- Difference in tax comparison report
- Gst invoice numbering and delivery challan numbering
- Sales amount in Gstr1
- E Commerce GSTR1 & 3B how to file
- GST Cancellation without jurisdiction
- Legal Opinion on Registrar's Refusal to Investigate a Society for Non-Renewal and Non-Compliance
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
