A taxpayer's refund claim, filed via RFD-01, was rejected by a Tax Officer using RFD-06 without providing any reasons. The advice given is to challenge the unreasoned RFD-06 through an appeal under Section 107, as a refund cannot be rejected without an RFD-08 notice and a hearing. While refiling the claim is an option, it's crucial to ensure compliance with the latest circulars on refunds to avoid further rejection.
23 July 2020
Respected Sir/Madam, Taxpayer had file Refund Claim by filling RFD-01 from Electronic Cash Ledger. After 21 days Tax Officer had rejected the refund claim by issuing RFD-06 without giving any reason. So, kindly suggest the solution for the same. May I file a new refund claim or any another any other solution?
24 July 2020
Yes, you could file a new refund claim, but make sure, u have gone through latest circular w.r.t to refunds and filed according to the latest circular or else ur claims is bound to be rejected.
29 October 2026
A refund can't be rejected without an RFD-08 notice and a hearing (Rule 92(3)); an unreasoned RFD-06 should be challenged by appeal under Sec 107 within three months rather than by refiling the same claim.
29 October 2026
Rejection without notice is irregular: Rule 92(3) requires an RFD-08 show-cause notice and a hearing before a refund is rejected, so either appeal the RFD-06 order in APL-01 within 3 months (Sec 107) or, if it was a curable defect, file a fresh claim within the Sec 54 time limit.