Understand why a negative lien is not a corporate guarantee and carries no transfer pricing implications, as clarified in the ITAT Delhi ruling in JOGPL Pvt Ltd.
High Courts warn the Income Tax Department against issuing 148A notices based solely on GST or Sales Tax Department data, stressing independent verification and inquiry.
A detailed analysis of GST implications arising from Circular No. 170/02/2022, highlighting state-wise SGST notices, ITC reversal and disclosure requirements, time-bar challenges u/s 16(4), rectification limits under Section 39(9), and the growing importance of accurate GSTR-3B reporting to avoid litigation and penalties.
A detailed comparison of key prosecution offences under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the new Income Tax Act, 2025, including sections on wilful tax evasion, failure to file returns, and non-payment of TDS/TCS.
Fines and penalties under Customs can be disproportionate and may need to be contested. However, to contest these, more is required to be done than merely citin..
The Madras High Court set aside a GST assessment after finding that portal-only notice service was ineffective. Learn what Section 169 mandates, why repeated portal notices aren't enough, and how taxpayers can avoid ex parte orders amid upcoming pre-deposit requirements.
Non-filing of ITR or non-payment of taxes can trigger prosecution under Section 276C of the Income Tax Act for willful tax evasion. Penalties include rigorous imprisonment up to 7 years and fines, especially where evasion exceeds Rs 25 lakh.
A GST demand order passed without granting a personal hearing violates Section 75(4) of the CGST Act and the principles of natural justice, as reaffirmed by the Gauhati High Court in Diganta Kumar Deka v. State of Assam. The court set aside the DRC-07 order and allowed de-novo proceedings with adjusted limitation.
Explore whether expenses incurred during a no-income period are allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 or Section 34(1) of ITA, 2025, and understand how unabsorbed depreciation is treated under Sections 32(2) and 33(11).
ITAT Ahmedabad rules that disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is not justified when the assessee has sufficient own funds for investments.
All Subjects Combo (Regular Batch) Jan & May 26