Corporate Guarantee vs Negative Lien: Key Transfer Pricing Clarification by ITAT Delhi



Quick Summary
This article clarifies the distinction between a corporate guarantee and a negative lien, particularly in the context of transfer pricing. A corporate guarantee involves one company (Co. B) backing another's (Co. A) debt, creating a liability if the borrower defaults. Conversely, a negative lien is an undertaking by an asset owner (Co. A) not to sell those assets without lender permission, which doesn't create a direct financial liability for the party providing the lien. The ITAT Delhi ruling highlights that a guarantee for an associated enterprise constitutes an international transaction, whereas a negative lien typically does not.

Consider a 100% subsidiary. Co. B provides a corporate guarantee to Bank C for Holding Co. A. This means that in case Co. A defaults, then Co. B would make good the borrowed amount to Bank C. A "negative lien," on the other hand, means an undertaking by the owner of assets to a lender not to sell these assets on which a charge or a lien is placed without the prior permission of the lender. It is an undertaking of convenience not to sell the encumbered assets. It does not create any liability on the assessee.

Corporate Guarantee vs Negative Lien: ITAT Delhi Clarification

In our example, the owner of assets, i.e., Co. A (which is the owner of all the assets of Co. B), gives an assurance to Bank C not to sell these assets on which there is a charge or a lien without the prior permission of Bank C. It is an undertaking of convenience by Co. A not to sell the encumbered assets. It does not create any liability on Co. B.

 

A negative lien is thus a negative covenant that restricts a person from creating any kind of encumbrance over his assets or otherwise disposing of them without the prior consent of the other person in whose favor he has given such an undertaking. Accordingly, the negative lien by an assessee does not provide any financial benefit/service to the other party. Even if the borrowers default on payment of the loan, there will be no liability on the assessee for paying any amount since the assessee is not a guarantor.

 

Taking into consideration the aforesaid position, the ITAT Delhi in the case of JOGPL PVT LTD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-13(1), DELHI [2025-VIL-1473-ITAT-DEL] held that certainly once the international transaction arising out of the guarantee given for the benefit of AE (i.e., guarantee by Co. B for Co. A) goes, then what is left is a transaction between the assessee (Co. B) and the Lender Bank (Bank C) only, which are unrelated parties. The vital constituent of an international transaction is that the same should be between associated enterprises. However, Section 92B(2) of the Income Tax Act outlines the circumstances under which a transaction between two persons would be deemed to be between the associated enterprises.

FAQ :

A corporate guarantee occurs when one company provides assurance to a lender that it will cover a debt if the primary borrower, often an associated enterprise, defaults. This creates a financial liability for the guarantor.

A negative lien is an agreement where an asset owner promises not to sell or encumber specific assets without the lender's prior consent. It does not create a direct liability for the party giving the lien, unlike a corporate guarantee.

No, a negative lien is an undertaking of convenience that restricts the sale of assets but does not create any financial liability for the assessee, even if the borrower defaults.

ITAT Delhi ruled that a corporate guarantee provided for the benefit of an associated enterprise constitutes an international transaction. However, a negative lien typically does not, as it doesn't involve associated enterprises in a way that creates a financial obligation.

Section 92B(2) of the Income Tax Act outlines specific circumstances under which a transaction between two parties is deemed to be between associated enterprises, which is a vital constituent of an international transaction.




About the Author

DESIGNATED PARTNER

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a FCA, Qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs and Taxation Committee of The Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry. He is the Convenor on Indirect Taxes of the CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is also a visiting faculty for Indirec ... Read more

Comments :

Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article