banner_ad

Corporate Guarantee vs Negative Lien: Key Transfer Pricing Clarification by ITAT Delhi



Consider a 100% subsidiary. Co. B provides a corporate guarantee to Bank C for Holding Co. A. This means that in case Co. A defaults, then Co. B would make good the borrowed amount to Bank C. A "negative lien," on the other hand, means an undertaking by the owner of assets to a lender not to sell these assets on which a charge or a lien is placed without the prior permission of the lender. It is an undertaking of convenience not to sell the encumbered assets. It does not create any liability on the assessee.

Corporate Guarantee vs Negative Lien: Key Transfer Pricing Clarification by ITAT Delhi

In our example, the owner of assets, i.e., Co. A (which is the owner of all the assets of Co. B), gives an assurance to Bank C not to sell these assets on which there is a charge or a lien without the prior permission of Bank C. It is an undertaking of convenience by Co. A not to sell the encumbered assets. It does not create any liability on Co. B.

 

A negative lien is thus a negative covenant that restricts a person from creating any kind of encumbrance over his assets or otherwise disposing of them without the prior consent of the other person in whose favor he has given such an undertaking. Accordingly, the negative lien by an assessee does not provide any financial benefit/service to the other party. Even if the borrowers default on payment of the loan, there will be no liability on the assessee for paying any amount since the assessee is not a guarantor.

 

Taking into consideration the aforesaid position, the ITAT Delhi in the case of JOGPL PVT LTD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-13(1), DELHI [2025-VIL-1473-ITAT-DEL] held that certainly once the international transaction arising out of the guarantee given for the benefit of AE (i.e., guarantee by Co. B for Co. A) goes, then what is left is a transaction between the assessee (Co. B) and the Lender Bank (Bank C) only, which are unrelated parties. The vital constituent of an international transaction is that the same should be between associated enterprises. However, Section 92B(2) of the Income Tax Act outlines the circumstances under which a transaction between two persons would be deemed to be between the associated enterprises.




About the Author

DESIGNATED PARTNER

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a FCA, Qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs and Taxation Committee of The Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry. He is the Convenor on Indirect Taxes of the CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is also a visiting faculty for Indirec ... Read more


CCI Pro

Comments


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details