Gujarat HC: Income Tax Dept Cannot Issue 148A Notices Solely on GST Dept Inputs



Quick Summary
The Gujarat High Court has ruled that the Income Tax Department cannot issue notices under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act based solely on information received from the GST Department. In a case involving Vasuki Global Industrial Limited, the Income Tax Department issued notices based on GST fraud allegations, which were later found to be incorrect, leading to the withdrawal of the notices. The court emphasised that the Income Tax Department must conduct its own independent inquiry and verification before taking action.

The Income Tax Department and the GST Department share information on the basis of which the other department acts. However, this act should not be done in haste but on one's own inquiry. A hasty action on the GST Department's information has caused some embarrassment for the Income Tax Dept. in the
Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

FAQ :

No, the Gujarat High Court has ruled that the Income Tax Department cannot issue notices under Section 148A solely on information provided by the GST Department. They must conduct their own inquiry and verification.

The Income Tax Department issued notices to buyers and sellers based on information from the GST Department alleging invoice fraud. However, the GST information was incorrect, and the notices had to be withdrawn, causing business disruption for the petitioner.

Before issuing a notice under Section 148A(1), the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer must verify the information suggesting escaped income and conduct an inquiry if necessary, with prior approval from the specified authority.

Yes, the Bombay High Court ruled that an Assessing Officer cannot make additions solely based on general information from the Sales Tax Department without proof of bogus transactions, and must consider documents provided by the assessee.




About the Author

DESIGNATED PARTNER

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a FCA, Qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs and Taxation Committee of The Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry. He is the Convenor on Indirect Taxes of the CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is also a visiting faculty for Indirec ... Read more

Comments :

Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article