When The Search is Attacked, But The Evidence Still Stands



Quick Summary
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that even if a search conducted under Section 67 of the CGST Act is alleged to be invalid, the evidence gathered during that search does not automatically become unusable. Proceedings under Section 74 for tax evasion can still continue, provided the evidence is relevant and the assessee has an opportunity to contest its admissibility. This decision emphasizes that the relevance of evidence is more critical than the procedural perfection of its collection in GST investigations.

When the Search is Questioned - Can the Evidence Still Survive? In legal discourse, particularly in matters involving search and seizure, one doctrine often captures both judicial imagination and professional debate - the "Fruits of the Poisonous Tree". The expression, though originating in crimina
Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

FAQ :

The 'Fruits of the Poisonous Tree' doctrine, originating in criminal law, states that if the source of evidence is tainted (poisonous tree), then any evidence derived from it (fruits) must also be considered tainted and inadmissible.

Yes, according to the Karnataka High Court, material gathered during an allegedly invalid search does not automatically become unusable in GST proceedings. Proceedings under Section 74 can continue if the evidence is relevant.

The article discusses the case of Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, Bengaluru North, West Commissionerate and Others v. Vigneshwara Transport Company, where the Karnataka High Court examined whether proceedings under Section 74 could survive an allegedly invalid search under Section 67.

The Supreme Court's judgment in Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation) established that Indian law does not exclude relevant evidence merely because it was obtained through an illegal search or seizure, emphasizing relevance over the method of acquisition.

No, the Division Bench clarified that proceedings under Section 74 are independent of search proceedings under Section 67. Even if a Section 67 search is alleged to be invalid, adjudication under Section 74 can still proceed based on relevant material.

Yes, the Division Bench acknowledged that material gathered by different Commissionerates in coordinated investigations can be relied upon by the proper officer issuing a show cause notice, provided it is relevant and made available to the assessee for a proper response.




About the Author

Partner

CA. Raj Jaggi is a Chartered Accountant based in New Delhi, primarily practising in the field of Goods and Services Tax (GST) consultancy, litigation support, and advisory services. After being associated with the leading indirect tax firm A.K. Batra and Associates for nearly 19 years, from June 2007 to March 2026, he ... Read more

Comments :

Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article