Non-compete clauses in India are primarily governed by Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which generally voids agreements restraining lawful professions. While restrictions during employment are typically enforceable due to an employee's duty of fidelity, post-termination non-competes are usually void unless they fall under specific exceptions like the sale of goodwill or certain commercial agreements with equal bargaining power. Landmark cases, such as Niranjan Shankar Golikari, clarify that in-term restrictions are valid, but post-termination restraints require proof of actual or likely misuse of trade secrets.
Non-compete clauses are frequently incorporated into employment and commercial contracts to safeguard the proprietary interests of businesses, such as confidential information, trade secrets, and client relationships. However, the enforceability of these clauses under Indian law is subject to strict
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The main law governing non-compete clauses in India is Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which states that agreements restraining a person from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business are void.
Yes, non-compete clauses are generally valid and enforceable during the term of employment because an employee owes a duty of fidelity and exclusivity to their employer.
Generally, non-compete clauses are void after employment ends under Section 27, as they restrict an individual's right to earn a livelihood. However, there are limited exceptions.
Exceptions include the sale of goodwill, reasonable restraints in partnership agreements, and non-compete clauses in franchise, joint venture, or M&A contracts where parties have equal bargaining strength and the restriction is reasonable.
No, Indian law does not follow the 'rule of reason' adopted in many common law jurisdictions. Restraints, even if partial or seemingly reasonable, are generally held to be void, especially in employment contexts post-termination.