Personal Hearing Cannot Be Waived by a Click: Gujarat HC Reaffirms Natural Justice Under GST



IMPORTANT GST RULING ON PERSONAL HEARING UNDER SECTION 75(4)

The Gujarat High Court in Komal Jayeshbhai Hemavat v. State Tax Officer 185 taxmann.com 856 has delivered a significant judgment reinforcing the sanctity of natural justice in GST adjudication proceedings.

Key Takeaway

Even if the taxpayer selects "NO" for personal hearing in Form DRC-06, the department cannot bypass the mandatory requirement of granting hearing opportunities before passing an adverse order under Section 74.

Personal Hearing Cannot Be Waived by a Click: Gujarat HC Reaffirms Natural Justice Under GST

Facts of the Case

  • Search proceedings were conducted and books were seized.
  • Show Cause Notice in Form DRC-01 was issued.
  • Assessee filed reply in Form DRC-06 and selected "NO" against personal hearing.
  • Department proceeded to pass an adverse order under Section 74 without granting any hearing.

The assessee challenged the order before the Gujarat High Court on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice.

What the High Court Held

The Court categorically observed that:

  • Section 75(4) mandates grant of personal hearing before passing an adverse order.
  • Procedural selection of "NO" in DRC-06 cannot override a statutory safeguard.
  • Adjudicating authorities are duty bound to provide adequate opportunity of hearing irrespective of such selection.
  • Failure to grant hearing vitiates the entire adjudication process.

The Court therefore quashed the order and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication.

Why This Judgment Is Important

This ruling is extremely relevant in the present GST litigation because many assessment orders are being passed mechanically on the basis of:

  • non-response,
  • portal defaults,
  • inadvertent procedural selections,
  • or technical non-compliances.
 

 The judgment reiterates that:

Natural justice is not a mere procedural formality, it is a substantive statutory right.

 

Important Observation

The Court also relied upon the doctrine of Audi Alteram Partem, no person should be condemned unheard, emphasizing that fairness in adjudication is fundamental to tax administration.

A very useful precedent for GST practitioners dealing with ex parte orders and denial of hearing matters.


104 Views Comment   Share GST   Report


About the Author

Practice


CCI Pro

Comments


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Accounts assistant

Shubh Consultancy

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
04 June 2026
Semi Qualified CA

Goyal Puneet & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Finance Manager- Chartered Accountant

Triveni Turbine Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details