banner_ad

Personal Hearing Cannot Be Waived by a Click: Gujarat HC Reaffirms Natural Justice Under GST



IMPORTANT GST RULING ON PERSONAL HEARING UNDER SECTION 75(4)

The Gujarat High Court in Komal Jayeshbhai Hemavat v. State Tax Officer 185 taxmann.com 856 has delivered a significant judgment reinforcing the sanctity of natural justice in GST adjudication proceedings.

Key Takeaway

Even if the taxpayer selects "NO" for personal hearing in Form DRC-06, the department cannot bypass the mandatory requirement of granting hearing opportunities before passing an adverse order under Section 74.

Personal Hearing Cannot Be Waived by a Click: Gujarat HC Reaffirms Natural Justice Under GST

Facts of the Case

  • Search proceedings were conducted and books were seized.
  • Show Cause Notice in Form DRC-01 was issued.
  • Assessee filed reply in Form DRC-06 and selected "NO" against personal hearing.
  • Department proceeded to pass an adverse order under Section 74 without granting any hearing.

The assessee challenged the order before the Gujarat High Court on grounds of violation of principles of natural justice.

What the High Court Held

The Court categorically observed that:

  • Section 75(4) mandates grant of personal hearing before passing an adverse order.
  • Procedural selection of "NO" in DRC-06 cannot override a statutory safeguard.
  • Adjudicating authorities are duty bound to provide adequate opportunity of hearing irrespective of such selection.
  • Failure to grant hearing vitiates the entire adjudication process.

The Court therefore quashed the order and remanded the matter back for fresh adjudication.

Why This Judgment Is Important

This ruling is extremely relevant in the present GST litigation because many assessment orders are being passed mechanically on the basis of:

  • non-response,
  • portal defaults,
  • inadvertent procedural selections,
  • or technical non-compliances.
 

 The judgment reiterates that:

Natural justice is not a mere procedural formality, it is a substantive statutory right.

 

Important Observation

The Court also relied upon the doctrine of Audi Alteram Partem, no person should be condemned unheard, emphasizing that fairness in adjudication is fundamental to tax administration.

A very useful precedent for GST practitioners dealing with ex parte orders and denial of hearing matters.




About the Author

Practice


CCI Pro

Comments


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members


CCI Articles

submit article


Company
08 May 2026
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT

SHAH LADHA AND ASSOCIATE

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 May 2026
Article Assistants

Acupro Consulting

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Senior Associate

ABHISHEK SHANKAR AGARWAL & ASSOCIATES

Kolkata

CA

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
ICSI Trainees for 21 Months and Semi-Qualified CS

CMNITY HIRE

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
Featured 26 May 2026
Account Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 05 May 2026
ARTICLED ASSISTANT

JS ADVISORS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 May 2026
CA Article /Trainee

Malik Sunil & co

New Delhi

CA Foundation

View Details