Assessments of EPC contractors cannot be done merely by assuming and comparing accounts with Form 26AS

EPC contractor's business is a typical business which includes manufacture, trading as well as provision of services. The cash flows happen at the very beginning of the project and maximum purchases happen at the very beginning. Biling is done and GST accrues as per Schedule of Biling as approved by the principle/client. The goods move to the site of the principle as per requirement and the Recognition of income is in accordance with the percentage completion method as prescribed by AS-9 issued by ICAI. Hence, the matching of the cash flows, GST records and accounting records for Income Tax purposes requires many reconciliations.

Many a times of Income Tax Authorities adopt a simplistic way of determining an estimated income of the EPC Contractors vide comparison of GP Ratio/ Form 26AS/etc although the assessee maintains voluminous details of the transactions carried out to run the business which are even audited. Wholesale rejection of books of accounts is not warranted just on the basis of Form 26AS or even low GP ratio as against average of last few years. While running a business, especially such a complicated business, it is not possible to maintain astatic graph of profit in all the years. The earning of profit depends upon several market conditions as well as the mode and manner in which the business has been carried out and in case assessee can demonstrate the same as comparable by reasonable means, the same cannot be rejected without substantive reasons.

Further, in most EPC contracts, there are disputes at the end of the project with the principle which is settled only by arbitration and hence after the project is completed the principles do not co-operate. Every year of assessment is a separate year and has its own specific and peculiar transactions. While making assessments, additions cannot be made only on account of fall in GP without any other basis and going into the books of accounts. The same was held in the case of TOTAL INTEGRATED DESIGN (INDIA) PVT. LTD Vs ITO, WARD-25(3), NEW DELHI [2023-VIL-1019-ITATDEL].

Even in case of professionals, many a times recognition of income is on cash basis whereas the recognition of the expense by the clients and deduction of TDS is on due basis. For example, in case of audit fees which is generally provided at the end of the year by the company on provisional basis. But the same is recorded by the auditor in the subsequent year on receipt basis resulting in mismatch of details of TDS contained in Form 26AS. At the time of payment, the company/auditor renegotiates the provision which has been created and a lesser/more payment is made but the TDS return filed for the previous year is not revised resulting in mismatch with Form 26AS. Hence the service Industry's books cannot be rejected only on the basis of Form 26AS without going into the evidences.