Delhi HC Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act

Last updated: 28 December 2023


In a significant verdict, the Delhi High Court, led by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Mini Pushkarna, has upheld the constitutional validity of Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act. The bench emphasized that statutory acts and their provisions should not be declared unconstitutional based on speculative fears of misuse or abuse of power.

The case, titled "Triveni Enterprises Limited Versus ITO," involves a challenge by the petitioner/assessee against orders passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2015- 16, 2016- 17, and 2017- 18, along with notices issued under Section 148. The petitioner specifically contested the constitutional validity of Section 115BBE.

Delhi HC Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 115BBE of Income Tax Act

The crux of the petitioner's argument was that reassessment notices were issued beyond the three-year limit from the end of the assessment years. Additionally, the petitioner contended that such notices should have obtained sanction from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax rather than the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax.

On the other side, the department argued that final assessment orders had already been passed after the issuance of the order under Section 148A(d). The department posited that the issue of limitation, being a mix of both fact and law, should be raised before the Appellate Authorities.

The court, in its ruling, dismissed the petitioner's contention and affirmed that Section 115BBE cannot be deemed unconstitutional based on mere apprehensions of misuse. The judges emphasized that the Income Tax Act provides a comprehensive mechanism for tax assessment or reassessment, and taxpayers are obligated to follow this process rather than bypassing it to invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Notable counsel in the case included Nishit Gandhi representing the petitioner and Aseem Chawla representing the respondent. The court case bears the number W.P.(C) 16280/2023 & CM APPLs.65559-655560/2023. This judgment is expected to set a precedent regarding the constitutional validity of Section 115BBE and reinforce the importance of following established legal procedures in tax matters.

Official copy of the order has been enclosed below




News posted by

Finance news reporter covering taxation, GST, income tax, business compliance, and economy updates. I simplify complex financial topics into easy-to-understand articles for professionals, taxpayers, and business owners on leading finance and tax platforms.


Comments



More »


Popular News





CCI Pro



Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 June 2026
Internal & Taxation Article

O P Bagla & Co LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
10 June 2026
Senior Account Executive

JDS Advisory LLP

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 June 2026
Accounts Executive

Getfive Advisors Pvt. Ltd.

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 June 2026
Article Assistance

RB KESHRI & CO.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details