banner_ad

Taxable liability

This query is : Resolved 

05 February 2013 taxable liability in case of expense which are disallowed even though the income from business remains under loss after such dis allowances. ??????

05 February 2013 The Tax liability may not arise but in case of tax evasion or wrong claims made, penalty may be levied.
.
Disallowance made on the discretionary basis by A O are not subject to penalty. Some thing cogent should be brought on the record for invoking penalty.
.

05 February 2013 Penalty could not be levied where the Total Income of the Assessee is in negative i.e.
loss after the completion of the Assessment Proceedings under the Income-tax Act,
1961. Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Rajasthan Vanaspati Product Limited, (2008) 8
DTR (Raj) 282, were it has been held that, Penalty under section 271(1)
(c)—Concealment—Assessment at loss—Penalty under s. 271(1)(c), prior to amendment
of Explanation 4 thereof by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1st, April, 2003, could not be
imposed in cases where, even after adding the concealed income, the assessed income
remained a loss. And concluded that, Penalty under s. 271(1)(c), prior to amendment of
Explanation 4 thereof by the Finance Act, 2002, w.e.f. 1st April, 2003, could not be
imposed in cases where, even after adding the concealed income, the assessed income
remained a loss.

26 July 2025 Hey! Here's a clear summary about taxable liability when expenses are disallowed but business still shows a loss:

---

### Situation:

* **Expenses disallowed by Assessing Officer (AO)**
* Business income remains a **loss even after disallowance**

---

### Tax Liability:

* **No tax liability arises** if the total income after disallowance is still a loss.
* Since no taxable income remains, **income tax payable is zero**.

---

### Penalty Implications:

* **Penalty under Section 271(1)(c)** (for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars) **cannot be levied if income remains negative (loss) after disallowance.**
* This is supported by case law:

* **Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Rajasthan Vanaspati Product Limited (2008) 8 DTR (Raj) 282**
* The court held that **penalty cannot be imposed if, even after adding concealed income, assessed income remains loss** (before 1 April 2003).
* However, discretionary disallowances by AO without strong basis usually **do not attract penalty**.
* Penalty will only be invoked if there is **evidence of concealment or willful misstatement**.

---

### Summary:

| Condition | Tax Liability | Penalty |
| ----------------------------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| Loss after disallowance remains loss | No tax payable | No penalty under 271(1)(c) |
| Income becomes taxable after disallowance | Tax on added income | Penalty possible if concealment established |

---

If you want, I can help you draft a written explanation or find more case laws on this. Let me know!


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro

Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details