Virtual Digital Assets can be treated as Capital Assets and Exemption can be claimed u/s 54F - ITAT Jodhpur



Quick Summary
A recent ITAT Jodhpur ruling clarifies that Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs), like Bitcoin, can be treated as capital assets, even before specific VDA definitions were introduced. The tribunal found that gains from selling Bitcoin held for over five years should be considered long-term capital gains. Crucially, the ruling allows taxpayers to claim an exemption under Section 54F if the proceeds from selling these assets are reinvested in a residential property.

Taxability of Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) - Recent order of ITAT Jodhpur Appellant: Raunaq Prakash Jain Respondent: Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Bhilwara Assessment Year: 2021-22 Tribunal: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jodhpur Bench Date of order: 28/11/2024 The case pertains to t
Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

FAQ :

Yes, according to the ITAT Jodhpur ruling, Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs) can be treated as capital assets, as they represent a form of property right.

If VDAs are held for more than 36 months and treated as capital assets, the gains from their sale can be taxed as long-term capital gains (LTCG).

Yes, the ITAT Jodhpur has ruled that if the proceeds from selling a VDA, treated as a capital asset, are reinvested in a residential property, an exemption under Section 54F can be claimed.

No, the ITAT Jodhpur confirmed that the specific provisions defining VDAs and their taxation regime in the Finance Act 2022 are prospective and apply only from April 1, 2022, onwards. They do not alter the tax treatment for prior periods.

The Assessing Officer (AO) had argued that Bitcoin was not a capital asset and treated gains as income from other sources, denying any capital gains treatment or Section 54F exemption.




About the Author

CA Practice

Hello Everyone, This is CA. Rohit Porwal. I am a Practicing Chartered with 8 year of Post Qualification experience. I am partner at Surat office of our firm M/s S. Jain Associates. Primarily working in the filed of Banking Audits, Taxation (Direct/Indirect), Litigation specially International Taxation(TP matter) and A ... Read more

Comments :

Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article