This article addresses the complex issue of claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) when a supplier's GST registration is cancelled retrospectively. It explains that while this situation can lead to penalties and accusations of 'fake ITC', taxpayers have grounds for defence. Key arguments include proving the supplier's active registration at the time of the transaction, demonstrating compliance with Section 16 of the CGST Act, and citing favourable judicial precedents.
Introduction
The issue regarding Input Tax Credit, which is claimed on invoices received from the suppliers whose GST registration was retrospectively cancelled, is an important matter that is in question in GST compliance, as indirectly it is attracting double taxation along with interest or penal
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
ITC is a mechanism within GST law that allows taxpayers to offset the tax paid on their purchases against the tax liability on their sales, thereby preventing double taxation.
When a supplier's GST registration is cancelled retrospectively, tax authorities may question the legitimacy of the ITC claimed by the buyer, potentially leading to denial of credit and penalties.
To claim ITC, taxpayers need a valid tax invoice, must have received the goods or services, paid the tax to the government (either directly or via reverse charge), and filed their GST return.
A recipient can argue that the supplier's registration was active at the time of the transaction, they acted in good faith, fulfilled all Section 16 conditions, the invoices appear in GSTR-2A, and cite relevant court judgments.
GST payers should maintain proper records, reconcile GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B diligently, and respond promptly and in detail to any notices, citing compliance and relevant judicial precedents.