Looking Beyond Geography to Legal Structure
In an increasingly globalised corporate environment, Indian enterprises now routinely extend their activities beyond national boundaries. Overseas conferences, international assignments, global training programmes, and cross-border client meetings have become standard components of corporate operations rather than exceptional events. Alongside these primary activities, auxiliary support services, such as accommodation, logistics, and vehicle rentals, inevitably follow.
While such arrangements may appear commercially straightforward, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework raises nuanced and often misunderstood issues regarding taxability, place of supply, export eligibility, and exposure to reverse-charge mechanisms.
कानून ज़मीन नहीं देखता ,
वह संरचना और संबंध पहचानता है।
[The law does not look at land or distance;
It recognises structure and relationships.]
This article adopts an advisory perspective to analyse the GST implications where an Indian GST-registered company provides car rental services to Indian corporate clients for use outside India through foreign vendors. Rather than offering fragmented answers, it presents a cohesive narrative aligned with how such transactions are typically examined during audits and appellate proceedings. The emphasis lies not merely on statutory provisions, but on their practical and defensible application.
Business and Contractual Framework - Why Structure Determines Tax Consequences
At the core of the GST analysis is the contractual framework of the transaction. In the current business model, the Indian entity is registered under GST and enters into direct contractual agreements with Indian corporate clients to offer car rental services to their employees travelling abroad. The vehicles are procured from overseas vendors that supply cars internationally; however, these foreign vendors function solely as subcontractors to the Indian supplier. All commercial terms, invoicing procedures, and considerations are conducted exclusively between the Indian supplier and its Indian corporate clients, with payments received within India in Indian rupees.
From an advisory perspective, this structural clarity is crucial. GST law imposes taxes on supplies based on the identity and location of both the supplier and the recipient, rather than the physical location where a subcontractor performs the service. The foreign vendor does not directly supply services to the Indian corporate client; instead, it supplies services to the Indian supplier company. As a result, the Indian supplier remains the primary supplier of car rental services, and this status does not change simply because the service is performed abroad . Experience indicates that when this principal-to-principal relationship is clearly documented, many interpretational disputes can be avoided from the start.
जो काग़ज़ों में साफ़ लिखा हो ,
वही अदालत में सच बनता है।
What is clearly written on paper
ultimately becomes truth in litigation.
Nature of Supply - Why the Service Qualifies as Passenger Transportation and Not Hiring of Vehicles
Before examining the applicable place-of-supply provisions under the IGST Act, it is essential to correctly identify the nature of the service being supplied . Under GST, classification is not driven by the mere use of a motor vehicle, but by the substance of the contractual obligation and the degree of control exercised by the service recipient.
A clear conceptual distinction exists between hiring or renting of motor vehicles (commonly referred to as rent-a-cab services) and passenger transportation services. In cases of hiring or renting, the vehicle is placed at the customer's disposal for a specified duration whether for a day, a week, or a month and remains under the effective control of the person availing the service. The customer decides when, where, and how the vehicle is to be used, and the supplier merely provides the vehicle (with or without a driver) without assuming any obligation to transport the customer from one specific point to another.
Passenger transportation services, on the other hand, operate on a fundamentally different footing. In such cases, the supplier undertakes the obligation to transport passengers between locations, typically with pick-up and drop-off points. The vehicle is never placed at the passenger's disposal or under the passenger's control. The route, timing, and operation of the conveyance remain with the supplier, and the passenger's role is limited to availing the transportation service itself.
In the present factual matrix, employees of Indian corporate clients are picked up and dropped at predetermined locations during overseas travel. The vehicles are not handed over for independent use, nor do the passengers exercise any control over their deployment. The supplier's obligation is confined to safe and timely conveyance, and not to renting or hiring the vehicle for general use. Accordingly, the service is correctly classifiable as a passenger transportation service, notwithstanding the use of motor vehicles as the mode of transport.
This classification remains uniform and consistent for the purposes of both outward supplies governed by Section 12 and inward supplies examined under Section 13 of the IGST Act. Once the nature of service is correctly identified, the place-of-supply analysis follows the statute in a logical and harmonious manner, without giving rise to internal contradictions or interpretational vulnerability.
The Statutory Threshold - Applicability of Section 12 Versus Section 13 of the IGST Act, 2017
One of the most frequent analytical errors in cross-border service transactions is the mechanical invocation of Section 13 of the IGST Act merely because the service is performed outside India. The statute, however, does not permit such discretion. Sections 12 and 13 operate in mutually exclusive domains, triggered by the supplier's and the recipient's respective locations.
Under the present arrangement, both the service provider (the Indian company) and the recipient of services (the Indian corporate client) are located in India. This fact alone mandates the application of Section 12 of the IGST Act for determining the place of supply of outward services. The physical location where the vehicle is used or driven is legally irrelevant at this stage. From an advisory lens, it is critical to appreciate that Section 13 can be invoked only where either the supplier, or the recipient is located outside India. Any attempt to apply Section 13 to outward supplies between two Indian entities is fundamentally inconsistent with the statutory design and often becomes a weak point in departmental arguments.
धारा का चुनाव भावना से नहीं,
विधि की भाषा से होता है। "
[The choice of provision is not driven by sentiment,
but by the language of the statute.]
Place of Supply for Outward Car Rental Services - Anchoring Taxability Under Section 12
Once Section 12 is established as applicable, the place of supply can be determined with relative certainty. In the present case, Section 12(9) shall apply because the Indian Supplier Company has agreed to supply a passenger transportation service to a registered person. Accordingly, the place of supply shall be the location of the recipient. Since Indian corporate clients invariably have a registered address in India, the place of supply in such cases is firmly situated within India.
This outcome can appear counterintuitive to businesses, particularly when the vehicle is hired, used, and returned entirely outside India. However, the GST law consciously separates physical performance from legal situs to ensure certainty and avoid subjective interpretations. From a risk-management perspective, it is important for businesses to accept this legislative choice rather than attempt to align tax treatment with perceived economic consumption. Where the contractual supply is between Indian entities, the place of supply remains in India, irrespective of overseas execution.
Taxability of Outward Supply - Why Overseas Performance Does Not Exclude GST
With the place of supply determined as India, the outward supply satisfies all statutory ingredients of a taxable supply under GST. The supplier and recipient are located in India, the place of supply is in India, and consideration is received in India. Accordingly, GST is clearly applicable to invoices raised by the Indian company on its corporate clients.
From an advisory perspective, it is important to caution against the assumption that overseas performance automatically renders a supply non-taxable. Practical audit experience reveals that tax authorities focus far more on contractual nexus than on operational geography.
Export of Services - Why Zero-Rating Is Not Legally Available
A natural corollary examined by businesses is whether such outward supplies can be regarded as exports of services and thereby qualify for zero-rated treatment. Section 2(6) of the IGST Act,2017 specifies a strict and cumulative set of conditions that must be met for a supply to be considered an export of services. All conditions must be fulfilled concurrently, and the failure to satisfy even a single condition invalidates the claim.
Under the current arrangement, the supply is deficient on multiple grounds. The service recipient is located in India, and payment is received in Indian currency rather than in convertible foreign exchange. These two factors alone are sufficient to disqualify the transaction from classification as an export of services, regardless of the location where the service is rendered. From an advisory standpoint, it is essential to acknowledge that the export of services under GST is a narrowly defined statutory concept and not a flexible commercial notion. Any attempt to broaden this definition is likely to invite adverse scrutiny.
हर विदेशी काम निर्यात नहीं होता ,
कानून हर दूरी को मान्यता नहीं देता।
[Not every foreign-linked service is an export;
The law does not recognise distance by default.]
Inward Procurement from Foreign Vendors - A Distinct and Independent Analysis
The GST treatment of inward services procured from foreign vendors must be analysed independently of the treatment of outward supplies. The fact that outward supply is taxable does not automatically determine the taxability of inward procurement. Legally, these are two separate supplies operating in different statutory compartments.
Under the current framework, foreign vendors provide car rental services to employees and officers of Indian Corporate Clients when they travel abroad. However, the foreign supplier of car rental services shall issue tax invoices to the Indian Supplier Company, which shall also be liable to make stipulated payments to the concerned foreign supplier. Consequently, the Indian Supplier Company is the recipient of these services. This structural clarity is essential when evaluating whether such inward services qualify as imports of services and whether reverse-charge liability applies.
Place of Supply for Inward Services - Operation of Section 13(10)
As the provider of inward services is situated outside India, the location of supply must be identified in accordance with Section 13 of the IGST Act. Section 13(10) specifically pertains to passenger transportation services and stipulates that the place of supply shall be the location where the passenger commences their journey on the conveyance for a continuous journey.
In international vehicle rental transactions, the journey commences outside India when the employee embarks on the conveyance for a continuous journey. Consequently, the supply of inward services is located outside India. This determination is not solely theoretical; it critically affects whether the transaction is classified as an import of services under Section 2(11) of the IGST Act, 2017.
Import of Services and Reverse Charge - Why Liability Does Not Arise
Section 2(11) of the IGST Act defines the term "import of services" as under and mandates fulfilment of the three cumulative conditions:
"Import of services" means the supply of any service, where -
(i) the supplier of service is located outside India;
(ii) the recipient of service is located in India; and
(iii) the place of supply of service is in India;
In the present context, only the first two conditions are satisfied, as the supplier of passenger transportation services is located outside India and the recipient of the service is located in India. However, as already stated above, under Section 13(10) of the IGST Act, 2017, the place of supply is outside India.
As a result, the inward procurement of car rental services from foreign vendors does not qualify as an "import of services" under GST law. Since there is no import of services, the reverse charge mechanism under the IGST Act is not triggered. Consequently, no IGST is payable by the Indian Supplier Company on such inward services, and the question of availing input tax credit does not arise . Although this conclusion may appear counterintuitive, it flows directly from the statutory framework and has a sound legal foundation.
जो तर्क मन को कठिन लगे ,
वही अक्सर क़ानून की सच्चाई होता है। "
[What appears difficult to accept intuitively
often represents the true logic of law.]
Department's Likely View Versus Taxpayer Defence - Anticipating the Fault Lines
In practice, disputes frequently arise not due to ambiguities in the law itself, but because its application challenges intuitive understandings of taxation. Tax authorities may be inclined to assert that overseas execution implies the applicability of Section 13 even for outward supplies, or that the involvement of foreign vendors automatically triggers the reverse charge mechanism. Nevertheless, a disciplined interpretation of the statutory provisions offers a robust defence. When both the supplier and the recipient are located in India, Section 12 governs outward supplies. Conversely, when the place of supply for inward services is outside India, the definition of import of services does not apply. Clearly drafted contracts, coherent invoicing, consistency of conduct, and aligned documentation substantially strengthen the taxpayer's defence.
Compliance and Documentation - Reducing Audit and Litigation Risk
Even if tax positions are legally valid, poor documentation can weaken otherwise strong arguments. Businesses should ensure that contracts explicitly define principal-to-principal relationships, invoices precisely detail the nature and scope of services, and payment records are transparent. During audits, documentation such as agreements with foreign vendors, proof of overseas shipments, and consistency between contractual terms and actions are crucial.
Proactive compliance not only fulfils statutory requirements but also influences the narrative during audits. When documentation demonstrates clarity of intent and consistency in implementation, the probability of extended litigation diminishes significantly.
अनुपालन बोझ नहीं ,
विवाद से बचने की सबसे सस्ती कीमत है।
[Compliance is not a burden;
it is the least expensive insurance against litigation.]
Concluding Reflection - Structure Is the True Destination
The GST treatment of overseas car rental services supplied by an Indian Supplier Company underscores a fundamental principle of indirect taxation: the law adheres to structure rather than geography. Vehicles may cross borders; however, taxability is determined by contracts, statutory definitions, and place-of-supply provisions. Physical performance outside India does not, in isolation, exempt a transaction from the GST net, nor does the engagement of foreign vendors necessarily trigger reverse charge liability.
For businesses and advisors alike, the essential lesson resides in disciplined structuring and meticulous documentation. When transactions are crafted with clarity, analysed with statutory accuracy, and supported by consistent records, GST exposure becomes foreseeable and defensible. In a regime where audit scrutiny is inevitable, such certainty transcends mere compliance—it becomes a deliberate and intelligent commercial strategy.
CAclubindia
