A landmark ruling by the CGIT, Delhi, in the Revent Precision Engineering case clarifies that the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) cannot claim dues, damages, or interest from a pre-insolvency period against a successful resolution applicant if these claims were not filed during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The tribunal emphasized that an approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) creates a 'clean slate' for the new management, making it binding on all stakeholders, including statutory authorities.
Introduction
In a significant judgment strengthening the "clean slate" principle under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (CGIT), Delhi, in M/s Revent Precision Engineering Ltd. vs Regional PF Commissioner-II, Gurugram (West), has held that EP
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Articles Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.