Tally

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More


Fraud, embezzlement, concealment of material facts, misappropriation, the list seem endless when the auditor is involved in the examination of financial statements.

Chanakya who lived in India, is considered to be Indian’s excellent leadership guru, economist, and a  political science teacher who authored the treatise, Arthashastra. He  summaries the following 40 types of embezzlement in the eighth chapter, Book 2 of Arthashastra titled Detection of Embezzlement by Government Audits. Even though the chapter deals with propriety aspects, it can be seen that it can be related to other organizations too.

In my humble effort, I am trying to make a connection with the types of embezzlements mentioned by the great pundit with our present day auditing.

The various types of embezzlements are:

1. what is realized earlier is entered later on

2. what is realized later is entered earlier

3. what ought to be realized is not realized

4. what is hard to realize is shown as realized

5. what is collected is shown as not collected

6. what has not been collected is shown as collected

7. what is collected in part is entered as collected in full

8. what is collected in full is entered as collected in part

9. what is collected is of one sort, while what is entered is of another sort

10. what is realized from one source is shown as realized from another

11. what is payable is not paid

12. what is not payable is paid

13. not paid in time

14. paid untimely

The above items can be traced on an analysis of teeming and lading errors while auditing the statements.

Items such as

1. small gifts made large gifts

2. large gifts made small gifts

3. what is gifted is of one sort while what is entered is of another

4. the real donee is one while the person entered as donee is another;

5. what has been taken into is removed while what has not been credited to it is shown as credited

can be pointed out on a detailed examination of books of accounts, purchase policies of the company, related parties, and the advantages received by the officials while authorizing the deals.

Embezzlements such as

1. materials that are not paid for are entered, while those that are paid for are not entered

2. an aggregate is scattered in pieces

3. scattered items are converted into an aggregate

4. commodities of greater value are bartered for those of small value

5. what is of smaller value is bartered for one of greater value

6. price of commodities enhanced

7. price of commodities lowered

can be discovered while examining the cut off procedures, inventories, sales, purchases, inventory valuation procedures, and principles etc.

The next four types viz;

1. number of of nights increased

2. number of nights decreased

3. the year not in harmony with its months

4. the month not in harmony with its days

can be found out by examining the daily wage sheets, daily time keeping records, records of output produced etc.

Certain inconsistencies like

 

inconsistency in the transactions carried on with personal supervision

can be found  out on an  analysis of governance of the organization and internal check procedures

misrepresentation of the source of income

can be well remembered with the example of Satyam scam

inconsistency in giving charities

by verifying proper authority of giving donations, its limits, procedures

lack of congruence in representing the work turned out

by evaluating the production records

inconsistency in dealing with fixed items

 through periodical verification and valuation of fixed assets, application of AS-28 etc adopted by the entity.

The remaining items like

1. misrepresentation of test marks or the standard of fineness

2. misrepresentation of prices of commodities

3. making use of false weight and measures

4. deception in counting articles

5. making use of false cubic measures       

                         

can be exposed by checking the purchases and sales, excise duty related factors and other taxation matters.

Chanakya points out  that under the above circumstances, the persons concerned such as the person in charge of the payments of the government treasury, the person who authorized the transaction, the receiver, the payer, the person who caused the payment, the servants of the officer  shall each be separately examined.

To quote Otto von Bismarck who said,

“With a gentleman I am always a gentleman and a half, and with a fraud I try to be a fraud and a half.”Similarly, an auditor should also exercise his judgment,  skill, and reason while examining the financial statements to obtain the best results.




Category Audit, Other Articles by - Lekshmi 



Comments


update