Quick Summary
In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court, in the case ofKshitij Ghildiyal vs. Director General of GST Intelligence, Delhi [W.P. (CRL) No. 3770/2024], has underscored the importance of protecting the rights of individuals during arrest. The court, in its decision dated December 16, 2024, held tha
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Broadcasts
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Delhi High Court ruled that the grounds for arrest must be communicated in writing to the arrested person.
The ruling was made in the case of Kshitij Ghildiyal vs. Director General of GST Intelligence, Delhi.
Written communication ensures transparency, adheres to the principles of natural justice, and protects individuals from arbitrary detention, as mandated by constitutional safeguards.
Yes, Section 19 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, requires proper documentation and communication of the grounds of arrest to the individual.
The arrest of the petitioner, Kshitij Ghildiyal, was quashed by the Delhi High Court because the authorities failed to provide the grounds of arrest in writing.
CAclubindia
