Removal of auditor in first agm of private limited company

Pvt ltd 1170 views 2 replies

 

respected sir,
 
     my company (its an private limited company) incorporation date is 11/09/2011 and the due date of agm is 31/12/2012, as the company has appointed first auditor in board meeting with in one week of incorporation now i have to change auditor in agm how can i change it...
and wheather first auditor required to file form 23b....
 
kindly solve my query and oblige me...
Replies (2)

 

Hi

 

It is required for both. The Provision of filing of Form-23B withe ROC is apply to both, first as well as subsequent appointment.

 

When you file your first Form-23AC they demand SRN of Form-23B, in that case you will give the details of your first auditor.

 

So, as per requirement of Form-23AC, form 23B is mandatory for all appointments.

 

 

APPOINTMENT OF OTHER THAN A RETIRING AUDITOR
 
A special notice of a resolution to be moved at an annual general meeting for appointing an auditor other than the retiring auditor or removing of an existing auditor is given to the company in the manner as prescribed under the Act.
 
Requirement of special notice to the company
 
Section 225(1) provides that special notice shall be to be given by a member and such special notice must comply with the  equirements of section 190. Following two types of resolutions or notice may be given under section 225 of the Act:—
(a) resolution at an annual general meeting for appointment of a person other than a retiring auditor as auditor;  and
 
(b) resolution at an annual general meeting providing expressly that retiring auditor shall not be reappointed.
 
Special notice has to be given to the company at least fourteen days before the date of the meeting. The period of fourteen days is exclusive of both the day of meeting and the day of notice. Moreover, special notice has to be given fourteen days before the date of the original meeting and not adjourned meeting. Thus, special notice received after the adjournment of original meeting cannot be taken and acted upon by a company.
 
In the case of Santosh Mani v New Delhi YMCA (1995) 19 CLA 178 (Del), it was held that even though the resolution moved by a shareholder not to re-appoint a retiring auditor failed to comply with requirement of section 188, yet since it was passed in annual general meeting when notice of resolution was given by company to all members and was carried by a majority, the same could be implemented.
 
The Department's Circular No. 5 of 1972, dated 21-2-1972 inter alia states that in view of section 225 special notice shall be required for a resolution appointing as an auditor a person other than the retiring auditor. Non-compliance with the provisions of the said section would render such a resolution illegal and ineffective.
 
Section 190 which provide a resolution requiring special notice applies to special notice under section 225.
 


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register